NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 2 Enhancing Performance as Collaborators in Care
NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 2 Enhancing Performance as Collaborators in Care
Name
Capella university
NURS-FPX 6614 Structure and Process in Care Coordination
Prof. Name
Date
Enhancing Performance as Collaborators in Care Presentation
Hello everyone, this is Wendy. Today, I’ll be discussing how to enhance performance through effective collaboration. Coordinating care is essential for delivering high-quality healthcare to adults with Chronic Heart Failure (CHF). Over 6.2 million adults in the United States are affected by CHF, and it is a leading cause of hospitalization in older populations (Bhatnagar et al., 2022). Interprofessional collaboration plays a vital role in this process by allowing healthcare professionals from various specialties to work together towards common goals. In this presentation, we will explore how different professions can better collaborate and offer educational services and resources for CHF patients.
Analyzing Steps to Improve Interprofessional Collaboration
To address the challenges associated with Chronic Heart Failure (CHF), it is crucial to begin with a comprehensive assessment of current practices in CHF care. This involves identifying gaps in communication, coordination, and decision-making among the multidisciplinary team. CHF management often requires the involvement of cardiologists, nurses, dietitians, and pharmacists, each contributing to different aspects of patient care (Raat et al., 2021). For example, consistent information sharing between specialists and primary care providers can lead to more cohesive care and higher readmission rates.
Development of a Collaborative Framework
Creating a structured collaborative framework is essential for effective CHF management. This framework should clearly outline the roles and responsibilities of each team member, ensuring everyone understands their contribution to patient care. For instance, a cardiologist might oversee medication management, while a nurse could handle patient education and symptom monitoring (King-Dailey et al., 2022). The assumption is that a well-defined framework will enhance clarity and coordination, leading to improved patient outcomes. To support this, standardized procedures for team meetings and patient handoffs should be established. The use of electronic health records can facilitate seamless information sharing and real-time updates on patient progress, which is critical for managing the complex needs of CHF patients.
Education and Training
Education and training are pivotal in improving collaboration among healthcare professionals managing CHF. Ongoing educational programs should focus on the importance of interprofessional collaboration and effective communication strategies tailored to CHF care (McMahon et al., 2024). The underlying assumption is that increasing awareness and skills related to collaboration will enhance the quality of care. Training initiatives might include workshops on CHF best practices, simulation exercises for care transitions, and joint educational programs involving all members of the CHF care team (White-Williams et al., 2020). These efforts can build trust among team members and improve their ability to work together effectively.
Integration of Evidence-Based Practices
Integrating evidence-based practices into CHF care is another crucial step. This involves adopting research and clinical guidelines that support collaborative approaches to managing CHF. The assumption is that evidence-based practices will lead to better care coordination and improved patient outcomes. For instance, clinical guidelines might recommend specific protocols for medication management or patient education that involve input from multiple specialists (McMahon et al., 2024). Regularly reviewing and updating care protocols based on the latest evidence ensures that the team’s approach remains effective and aligned with best practices.
Continuous Evaluation and Improvement
Implementing mechanisms for continuous evaluation and improvement is essential for enhancing collaboration in CHF care. This means regularly assessing the effectiveness of collaborative efforts and their impact on patient outcomes. The assumption is that ongoing evaluation and feedback will identify areas for improvement and drive enhancements in collaboration. Metrics such as readmission rates and patient satisfaction scores can provide valuable insights into the success of collaborative initiatives (Latrella & Baldasare, 2024). Tools like patient surveys and performance reviews can be used to gather feedback and make necessary adjustments, ultimately improving collaboration and overall care for CHF patients.
Educational Services and Resources
Effective management of Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) relies heavily on structured patient education programs such as the American Heart Association’s (AHA) “Heart Failure: A Guide for Patients and Their Families.” This program provides essential information on understanding CHF, medication adherence, and lifestyle changes (Heidenreich et al., 2022). The “Living Well with Heart Failure” workshops, developed by the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), offer in-depth training on symptom management, dietary modifications, and physical activity tailored to CHF patients (Clements et al., 2022). Additionally, the “MyHeartCounts” mobile app by Stanford Medicine provides tools for tracking symptoms, medication reminders, and educational content (Christle et al., 2020). It also helps patients to engage actively in their care.
Digital Health Tools
Digital health tools play a pivotal role in managing CHF. Telehealth platforms such as “Teladoc” and “Amwell” enable regular remote consultations with healthcare providers, ensuring continuous monitoring and personalized care for patients with mobility or transportation challenges (Yadav, 2024). The “MyChart” app by Epic Systems allows patients to track their symptoms, manage medications, and access educational resources from their healthcare provider (Yadav, 2024). The “CardioSmart” platform by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) offers a wealth of educational materials, including videos and articles, to support CHF patients in understanding their condition and adhering to their care plans.
Support Groups and Healthcare Provider Training
Support groups and community resources provide crucial support for CHF patients. The “Heart Failure Support Group” by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) offers a space for patients to share experiences, discuss challenges, and receive peer support (Kho et al., 2022). Community health programs, such as the “Better Choices, Better Health” program by the Stanford Patient Education Research Center, provide additional resources like nutritional counseling and exercise classes specifically designed for CHF patients (White-Williams et al., 2020). On the provider side, the “Heart Failure Symposium” by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and “Heart Failure Boot Camp” by the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) offer ongoing training and education for healthcare professionals (Heidenreich et al., 2022). These programs ensure that providers remain informed about the latest advancements in CHF care, fostering improved care coordination and patient outcomes.
Collaboration and Partnership with Interprofessional Team Members
To enhance care for Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) patients, our strategy involves forming a multidisciplinary team including cardiologists, nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, and social workers. This team will participate in regular interdisciplinary meetings to ensure a unified approach to patient care. Each member will contribute their expertise to create a comprehensive care plan, addressing various aspects of CHF management (King-Dailey et al., 2022). Clements et al. (2022) highlight the importance of such collaborative efforts in improving patient outcomes and reducing hospital readmissions. Utilizing shared electronic health records (EHRs) will facilitate seamless communication and coordination among team members, allowing for real-time updates and a holistic view of patient care.
In addition to structured communication, ongoing evaluation and feedback will be integral to our collaboration plan. Regular assessments will be conducted to gather input from both patients and healthcare providers, ensuring that any issues are promptly addressed. The “Patient-Centered Care” model supports continuous feedback to refine care practices and enhance patient satisfaction (Kalantzi et al., 2023). By maintaining an open line of communication and focusing on iterative improvements, we aim to optimize care coordination, resulting in better health outcomes for CHF patients and a more efficient care delivery system.
Proposed Outcomes of Improved Interprofessional Collaboration
The implementation of an enhanced interprofessional collaboration process for Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) care is expected to yield several positive outcomes. By fostering a more cohesive team approach and utilizing integrated communication tools, we anticipate a significant reduction in hospital readmissions and improved management of CHF symptoms. Kho et al. (2022) support that such interdisciplinary coordination leads to better patient outcomes, including enhanced medication adherence, improved self-management skills, and overall quality of life. The structured communication protocols and regular team meetings will ensure that all members are aligned with the patient’s care plan, reducing the likelihood of fragmented care and missed follow-ups.
Several underlying assumptions and uncertainties must be acknowledged. The success of this process relies on the consistent engagement and collaboration of all team members, which may influence varying levels of commitment and availability. Additionally, the effectiveness of shared EHR systems depends on their seamless integration and the accuracy of data entry (Yadav, 2024). There is also an assumption that patients will actively participate in their care and adhere to the educational and treatment plans provided. Addressing these uncertainties involves ongoing training, support for healthcare professionals, and patient engagement strategies to ensure that the collaborative process remains effective and adaptable to any challenges that arise.
Ethical Considerations in Improving Care Coordination
The scope and standards of practice for care coordination emphasize the ethical principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and respect for autonomy. In the context of Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) care, these principles guide the implementation of a nurse-led transitional care management program, such as the Heart Failure Transitional Care Program at the Cleveland Clinic (Raat et al., 2021). This program ensures that all patients receive equitable, high-quality care while respecting their individual preferences and needs. Beneficence involves taking actions that benefit the patient, while non-maleficence requires avoiding harm. For CHF patients, this means implementing interventions that improve health outcomes without causing undue distress.
The Cleveland Clinic’s Heart Failure Transitional Care Program provides comprehensive discharge planning, personalized education, and regular follow-ups, which are designed to reduce readmission rates and enhance patient well-being. Research by King-Dailey et al. (2022) shows that such programs improve medication adherence and patient outcomes, aligning with the ethical principle of beneficence. By avoiding gaps in care and preventing complications, the program adheres to non-maleficence.
Justice requires fairness in the distribution of healthcare resources, ensuring that all patients have equal access to necessary services. The Chronic Care Management Program by the American Heart Association (2023) addresses disparities in access to care, such as those faced by underserved populations. The program incorporates resources like telehealth, community-based support groups, and patient navigation services to overcome barriers related to geographic and socioeconomic factors, promoting justice (Heidenreich et al., 2022). Respect for autonomy involves honoring patients’ preferences and involving them in decision-making regarding their care. Programs like the Patient Education and Support Initiative at Mayo Clinic empower patients with the knowledge to manage their condition effectively, thereby respecting their autonomy and supporting informed decision-making.
Conclusion
Improving teamwork among healthcare professionals is vital to better managing Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) and reducing hospital readmissions. By creating clear roles, using evidence-based practices, and providing ongoing education, we can enhance patient care. Regular evaluation and feedback will help refine these strategies. Ethical principles such as fairness and respect for patients guide these efforts. Overall, these approaches aim to improve outcomes and quality of life for CHF patients.
References
Bhatnagar, R., Fonarow, G. C., Heidenreich, P. A., & Ziaeian, B. (2022). Expenditure on heart failure in the United States. JACC: Heart Failure, 10(8), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2022.05.006
Christle, J. W., Hershman, S. G., Torres Soto, J., & Ashley, E. A. (2020). Mobile health monitoring of cardiac status. Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science, 3(1), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-030220-105124
Clements, L., Frazier, S. K., Lennie, T. A., Chung, M. L., & Moser, D. K. (2022). Improvement in heart failure self-care and patient readmissions with caregiver education: A randomized controlled trial. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 45(5), 019394592211412. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459221141296
Heidenreich, P. A., Bozkurt, B., Aguilar, D., Allen, L. A., Byun, J. J., Colvin, M. M., Deswal, A., Drazner, M. H., Dunlay, S. M., Evers, L. R., Fang, J. C., Fedson, S. E., Fonarow, G. C., Hayek, S. S., Hernandez, A. F., Khazanie, P., Kittleson, M. M., Lee, C. S., Link, M. S., & Milano, C. A. (2022). 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation, 145(18). https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000001063
NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 2 Enhancing Performance as Collaborators in Care
Kalantzi, V., Ioanna Panagiota Kalafati, Belitsi, V., Tsiampalis, T., Ioannis Koutsonasios, Odysseas Androutsos, Fotini Bonoti, Panagiotakos, D. Β., & Kosti, R. I. (2023). Cardiometabolic patient-related factors influencing the adherence to lifestyle changes and overall treatment: A review of the recent literature. Life, 13(5), 1153–1153. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13051153
Kho, A. N., Daumit, G. L., Truesdale, K. P., Brown, A. F., Kilbourne, A. M., Ladapo, J. A., Wali, S., Cicutto, L., Matthews, A. K., Smith, J. S., Davis, P., Schoenthaler, A., Gbenga Ogedegbe, Islam, N., Mills, K. L., He, J., Watson, K. S., Winn, R. A., Stevens, J., & Huebschmann, A. G. (2022). The National Heart Lung and Blood Institute disparities elimination through coordinated interventions to prevent and control heart and lung disease alliance. Health Services Research, 57(S1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13983
King-Dailey, K., Frazier, S., Bressler, S., & King-Wilson, J. (2022). The role of nurse practitioners in the management of heart failure patients and programs. Current Cardiology Reports, 24(12), 1945–1956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-022-01796-0
Latrella, M., & Baldasare, L. (2024). Improving patient outcomes while reducing readmissions with data analytics. Management in Healthcare, 8(3), 212–220. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hsp/mih/2024/00000008/00000003/art00003
NURS FPX 6614 Assessment 2 Enhancing Performance as Collaborators in Care
McMahon, J., Thompson, D. R., Cameron, J., Christine Brown Wilson, Hill, L., Tierney, P., Yu, D., Moser, D. K., Spilsbury, K., Nittaya Srisuk, Jos M. G. A. Schols, van, & Mitchell, G. (2024). Heart failure in nursing homes: A scoping review of educational interventions for optimizing care provision. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 6, 100178–100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100178
Raat, W., Smeets, M., Janssens, S., & Vaes, B. (2021). Impact of primary care involvement and setting on multidisciplinary heart failure management: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. ESC Heart Failure, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13152
White-Williams, C., Rossi, L. P., Bittner, V. A., Driscoll, A., Durant, R. W., Granger, B. B., Graven, L. J., Kitko, L., Newlin, K., & Shirey, M. (2020). Addressing social determinants of health in the care of patients with heart failure: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 141(22). https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000767
Yadav, S. (2024). Transformative frontiers: A comprehensive review of emerging technologies in modern healthcare. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.56538