NURS FPX 6612 Assessment 1 Triple Aim Outcome Measures

Name

Capella university

NURS-FPX 6612 Health Care Models Used in Care Coordination

Prof. Name

Date

Triple Aim Outcome Measures and Implementation 

Hello, my name is ——. As a case manager, I would like to present how Sacred Heart Hospital (SHH) can adopt the Triple Aim framework—improving population health, reducing healthcare costs, and enhancing the patient care experience. This initiative necessitates support and collaboration from hospital administrators and clinical personnel. In addition, governmental programs and performance measures will be reviewed to facilitate a structured and effective care coordination strategy aligned with the goals of the Triple Aim.

Purpose of the Presentation

The core objective of this presentation is to inform and engage the leadership at SHH about the strategic importance of coordinated care in achieving the Triple Aim for the Barnes County Community. The emphasis lies in integrating care coordination models, patient self-management practices, and government-mandated regulations to advance population health, reduce costs, and enhance care quality. Achieving these goals will require collaborative efforts from all healthcare team members to promote an interdisciplinary approach.

Triple Aim Principles and Organizational Impact

The Triple Aim, conceptualized by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, rests on three pivotal goals: improving the patient care experience, reducing the per capita cost of healthcare, and enhancing population health. These principles offer significant benefits for SHH, particularly in addressing the needs of the Barnes County Community.

Enhancing Patient Experience and Satisfaction

To elevate the patient experience, SHH should implement patient-centered strategies that include effective communication, shared decision-making, and reducing barriers such as long wait times and low health literacy (Kwame & Petrucka, 2021). Understanding community-specific needs—such as access to health insurance and follow-up care—will enhance satisfaction and trust in the healthcare system.

Improving Community and Population Health

SHH can foster community health by promoting preventive care programs and increasing health literacy among the Barnes County population. Collaborating with local organizations and addressing social determinants of health, such as transportation and occupation-related constraints, can empower individuals to take part in health-improvement activities, thereby decreasing preventable illnesses (Yamada & Arai, 2020).

Reducing Per Capita Costs

Reducing healthcare costs requires implementing cost-effective models, utilizing digital tools, and forming partnerships with healthcare agencies. These efforts, including reducing unnecessary hospital readmissions, can lead to high-quality care within budget constraints (Fichtenberg et al., 2020). Strategic resource management enables SHH to improve outcomes while ensuring financial sustainability.

Health Models Supporting the Triple Aim

To strengthen the care coordination process, two health models—Patient Self-Management Model (PSMM) and Care Coordination Model (CCM)—are particularly relevant. These models align with and support the goals of the Triple Aim.

Patient Self-Management Model (PSMM)

The PSMM empowers patients to actively participate in managing their own health. This approach emphasizes patient education and shared decision-making, fostering autonomy and accountability. Patients who are well-informed about their conditions tend to adhere better to treatment plans and engage in preventive behaviors, which leads to improved outcomes and satisfaction (Fu et al., 2020; Lonc et al., 2020). Enhanced self-management reduces complications and encourages early intervention.

Care Coordination Model (CCM)

The CCM aims to provide seamless healthcare services by enhancing communication between different healthcare providers and systems. The evolution of this model—from fragmented to integrated care—has improved patient safety, minimized duplication of services, and promoted continuity of care, particularly for chronic or complex cases (Karam et al., 2021; Carayon et al., 2020). Use of electronic health records and patient portals strengthens this model’s effectiveness.

Table: Comparative Overview of Health Models

Feature	Patient Self-Management Model (PSMM)	Care Coordination Model (CCM)
Main Focus	Empowering patients to self-manage their conditions	Enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration and communication
Benefits	Improved adherence, preventive care, patient satisfaction	Reduced fragmentation, improved safety, cost-efficiency
Technological Integration	Wearables, mobile health apps, patient portals	Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Exchange
Application Scope	Chronic disease management, outpatient education	Hospital discharges, multi-specialist collaboration
Supports Triple Aim	Yes – improves experience and outcomes while reducing cost	Yes – enhances safety, reduces cost, improves care continuity

Data Structures and Evidence Collection in Health Models

The structure of PSMM emphasizes continuous patient data collection through tools like wearable devices and mobile health apps. This approach provides real-time insights into lifestyle choices, medication adherence, and symptom management. The continuous inflow of patient-generated data enhances the quality of evidence, supporting informed clinical decision-making (Solomon & Rudin, 2020; Awad et al., 2021).

The CCM uses EHRs to facilitate real-time data access and sharing between providers. It also incorporates performance indicators that evaluate care transitions, coordination quality, and safety standards. This interconnected structure helps identify gaps in care and areas for quality improvement (Du et al., 2019; Javed et al., 2020).

Evidence-Based Data in Nursing Coordination

Evidence-based practice is vital for enhancing care coordination. Nurses use data to design personalized care plans, reduce clinical errors, and align treatments with best practice guidelines. Access to current research and guidelines ensures consistent, high-quality care delivery (Belita et al., 2020).

Effective communication based on evidence also improves team collaboration. Regular interprofessional meetings, case discussions, and data-sharing platforms facilitate comprehensive care planning tailored to each patient’s condition (Hoffmann et al., 2023).

Government Initiatives and Performance Metrics

Multiple government-led initiatives are designed to support the Triple Aim by improving care coordination and reducing costs.

Health Information Exchange (HIE)

The HIE initiative promotes the electronic sharing of patient information among providers, improving continuity and reducing redundant testing. Benefits include improved medication reconciliation, timely interventions, and lower healthcare costs (Zhuang et al., 2020).

Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP)

Administered by CMS, the MSSP incentivizes Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) to reduce costs while improving care quality. Participating organizations receive shared savings for achieving set benchmarks in patient satisfaction and cost efficiency (McWilliams et al., 2020).

Meaningful Use Program

This initiative motivates providers to adopt and effectively use EHRs to enhance care coordination. Benefits include improved interoperability, higher patient engagement, and better tracking of care outcomes.

Conclusion

By adopting models such as PSMM and CCM, Sacred Heart Hospital can successfully address the principles of the Triple Aim. Through structured care coordination, use of technology, and implementation of government programs, SHH can deliver high-quality, cost-effective, and patient-centered care. These efforts will ensure better outcomes for the Barnes County Community and support the strategic goals of modern healthcare systems.

References

Awad, A., Trenfield, S. J., Pollard, T. D., Ong, J. J., Elbadawi, M., McCoubrey, L. E., Goyanes, A., Gaisford, S., & Basit, A. W. (2021). Connected healthcare: Improving patient care using digital health technologies. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 178(1), 113958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.113958

NURS FPX 6612 Assessment 1 Triple Aim Outcome Measures

Belita, E., Squires, J. E., Yost, J., Ganann, R., Burnett, T., & Dobbins, M. (2020). Measures of evidence-informed decision-making competence attributes: A psychometric systematic review. BMC Nursing, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00436-8

Bloem, B. R., Henderson, E. J., Dorsey, E. R., Okun, M. S., Okubadejo, N., Chan, P., Andrejack, J., Darweesh, S. K. L., & Munneke, M. (2020). Integrated and patient-centred management of parkinson’s disease: A network model for reshaping chronic neurological care. The Lancet Neurology, 19(7), 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30064-8

Carayon, P., Wooldridge, A., Hoonakker, P., Hundt, A. S., & Kelly, M. M. (2020). SEIPS 3.0: Human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety. Applied Ergonomics, 84(84), 103033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103033

Chelladurai, U., & Pandian, S. (2021). A novel blockchain based electronic health record automation system for healthcare. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03163-3

Du, S., Liu, W., Cai, S., Hu, Y., & Dong, J. (2019). The efficacy of e-health in the self-management of chronic low back pain:A meta analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 103507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103507

Facchinetti, G., D’Angelo, D., Piredda, M., Petitti, T., Matarese, M., Oliveti, A., & De Marinis, M. G. (2020). Continuity of care interventions for preventing hospital readmission of older people with chronic diseases: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 101, 103396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103396

Fichtenberg, C., Delva, J., Minyard, K., & Gottlieb, L. M. (2020). Health and human services integration: Generating sustained health and equity improvements. Health Affairs, 39(4), 567–573. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01594

NURS FPX 6612 Assessment 1 Triple Aim Outcome Measures

Fu, W., Liu, Q., Qiu, X., Liu, S., & Xu, J. (2020). Evaluation of the effect of self-management model in diabetic patients in community under the guidance of general practitioners. Chinese Journal of Health Management, 431–436. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/wpr-869261

Hoffmann, T., Bennett, S., & Mar, C. D. (2023). Evidence-based practice across the health professions. In Google Books. Elsevier Health Sciences. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=BbbREAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=evidence-based+data+and+informed+decision+making+in+healthcare&ots=YwEpeVeZ7R&sig=gjLV8pNjZBysDztQObgdjgTX6yg

Javed, A. R., Sarwar, M. U., Beg, M. O., Asim, M., Baker, T., & Tawfik, H. (2020). A collaborative healthcare framework for shared healthcare plan with ambient intelligence. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-020-00245-7

Karam, M., Chouinard, M.-C., Poitras, M.-E., Couturier, Y., Vedel, I., Grgurevic, N., & Hudon, C. (2021). Nursing care coordination for patients with complex needs in primary healthcare: A scoping review. International Journal of Integrated Care, 21(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5518

Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2021). A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: Barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nursing, 20(158), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2

Lonc, N. Ś., Polański, J., Tański, W., & Polańska, B. J. (2020). Impact of satisfaction with physician–patient communication on self-care and adherence in patients with hypertension: Cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05912-0

McWilliams, J. M., Hatfield, L. A., Landon, B. E., & Chernew, M. E. (2020). Savings or selection? Initial spending reductions in the medicare shared savings program and considerations for reform. The Milbank Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12468

Mohammadzadeh , N., Saeedi, S., & Rezayi, S. (2021). A review of the process of meaningful use program and its challenges in the electronic health record roadmap. Journal of Health and Biomedical Informatics, 8(1), 117–127. http://jhbmi.ir/article-1-540-en.html

Solomon, D. H., & Rudin, R. S. (2020). Digital health technologies: Opportunities and challenges in rheumatology. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 16(9), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0461-x

NURS FPX 6612 Assessment 1 Triple Aim Outcome Measures

Yamada, M., & Arai, H. (2020). Long-term care system in japan. Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research, 24(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.20.0037

Zhuang, Y., Sheets, L. R., Chen, Y.-W., Shae, Z.-Y., Tsai, J. J. P., & Shyu, C.-R. (2020). A patient-centric health information exchange framework using blockchain technology. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 24(8), 2169–2176. https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2020.2993072