NURS FPX 6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change

Name

Capella university

NURS-FPX 6218 Leading the Future of Health Care

Prof. Name

Date

Proposing Evidence-Based Change

Mental illness is a widespread health issue in the United States, affecting approximately one in five individuals. Among young people aged 13 to 18, more than one in five report encountering a highly disabling mental disorder during their lives. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), one in 25 individuals in the U.S. grapples with Serious mental health conditions, including Mood disorder, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia (CDC, 2023). It is an important issue for people’s well-being and the primary objective for the authorities of the United Kingdom.  Early detection and treatment of psychological wellness issues is crucial as it can improve results in the long run (Crane et al., 2019).

Executive Summary

Suggested change

The research introduces a three-step methodology for mental health services, focusing on services easily deliverable by primary care providers, practical collaborative strategies, and systemic changes. This structure enhances the identification, therapy, and precaution of mental health concerns, emphasizing the crucial role of public health providers (Dalgleish et al., 2020). Policies like universal preschool, ensuring Medicaid coverage for the elderly and disabled, and the implementation of universal childcare are essential to tackle the socioeconomic factors contributing to poor mental health. Encouraging health systems to manage expenditures effectively, strategies such as accountable care and total cost of care on a population-based global budgeting scale could improve overall mental health within the population (McGinty, 2023).  Reduced funding for construction, social, and services related to the environment has been linked to a decline in the psychological well-being of the English populace. In particular, reductions to planning and development services had an enormous effect. Reinvesting in these programs can lead to better psychological outcomes for the general populace (Fahy et al., 2023). 

Local or Regional Health Care System for the Suggested Change

One institution in the US requiring reforms in mental health care is the Central State Hospital (CSH) in Virginia. Many obstacles stand in the way of providing appropriate mental health and addiction therapies. These include a lack of funding, lengthy wait times, a scarcity of experts, inadequate government monitoring, stigma, linguistic and cultural hurdles, inequities, and financial difficulties brought on by private insurance policies (Moroz et al., 2020).  Addressing inequalities based on race in treatment for mental illness and averting the repercussions of unmet therapy for mental illness demands depend on understanding the obstacles African Americans face when trying to get psychological care. Individual, medical, and institutional concerns are self-sufficiency, societal judgment, distrust of doctors, not having accessible resources, lack of conveyance, and financial hardships have all been obst­­acles for African Americans of all ages (Planey et al., 2019). Furthermore, in studying teenage help-seeking behavior, it is critical to have common terminology, theoretical frameworks, and high methodological standards. It improves the data’s generalizability and consistency, which helps with intervention development and prompt access to psychological well-being (Velasco et al., 2020). 

Expectations

A mental health institution pledges to provide a comprehensive strategy that includes increased accessibility to efficient mental health treatments, public education, and awareness campaigns. Anticipate a concentrated effort to promote awareness of mental health disorders, their effects on social integration, and effective management techniques, guaranteeing all-encompassing treatment for those in need of assistance and recovery (Sneha et al., 2019). A forward-thinking hospital actively develops new methods for managing, diagnosing, and treating mental health conditions. A significant commitment is to remove the current obstacles to delivery, with an eye toward the future and an emphasis on doing evidence-based research to assess the efficacy of solutions and deal with associated issues. The hospital strongly focuses on offering comprehensive and cutting-edge care to improve the well-being of people needing mental health assistance (Drissi et al., 2020).

Optimal Outcomes 

A mental health program should aim to improve participants’ mental health, reduce symptoms, and improve their overall quality of life. These objectives guide the program: to help people in their path towards mental health and promote long-lasting, positive improvements. Achieving these goals requires overcoming stigma, resource shortages, and financial sustainability (Nelson et al., 2019). A multidisciplinary psychological care model can reduce preventable hospitalizations and redundant services, significantly reducing healthcare costs and potentially gaining support from providers, insurance companies, and government programs (Busch & Kyanko, 2020).

Limiting Factors

Introducing a new mental health care model can face challenges like professional resistance, high training costs, and bureaucratic issues. Overcoming these requires transparent communication, comprehensive training programs, and policy collaboration to create a more efficient mental healthcare system (Țăran et al., 2022). Who is Going to Pay for the Care? The administration of Vice President Joe has increased funding for Local Mental Wellness Services Block Funds from Fiscal Year (FY)21 to $1.6 billion in the FY22 budget. Increased funding highlights a proactive approach to the growing national psychological wellness crisis (Alegría et al., 2022). The study reveals a significant disparity in mental health networks compared to medical networks among participants. It implies that enhancing the integration of psychological wellness therapy into routine medical care might support insurance companies in creating strong provider networks, therefore enhancing patient availability of mental health services.(Busch & Kyanko, 2021).

The Rationale for the Suggested Changes

Telehealth services enhance accessibility and overcome geographical barriers to mental health, providing timely support and interventions, reducing emergency crises, and potentially improving long-term health outcomes (Molfenter et al., 2021). Integrating multidisciplinary teams and telehealth services improves patient outcomes and exhibits cost-effectiveness through preventative measures, efficient resource usage, and decreased duplicate services (Knapp & Wong, 2020).

Analyzing Health Care Systems from Germany and France

The German mental healthcare system offers a comprehensive analysis of hospital-based and outpatient mental healthcare, serving as a global mental health policy model. Its framework, service delivery, and organizational structure guide best practices and improvements, paving the way for further evaluation (Thom et al., 2021). Together, they offer a complete picture of the organizational design, prevailing social perceptions, and recent advancements in the German mental health care system. Global mental health practitioners and policymakers can improve and modernize their strategies to better serve the needs of various communities by embracing the lessons learned from Germany (Otten et al., 2021). The effectiveness of France’s mental healthcare system is mainly dependent on government efforts and policy backing. The national mental health plan describes the financing sources and strategic objectives for improving mental health care. By ensuring a well-coordinated and supported system, this strategy establishes France as a leader in mental health policy (M. R et al., 2019). It is acknowledged that France focuses on early intervention and preventative techniques. The significance of preventative interventions in the French mental health care system is emphasized by research. By identifying and treating mental health issues early on, these programs hope to lessen the long-term effects and strain on both the healthcare system and the people affected (Varga et al., 2021).

Implications for Finance and Health

The study examines the financial impact of mental health parity legislation in the US, the goal being to ensure that mental health insurance is comparable to other medical services. It examines insurance coverage, cost structures, and the overall economic effects of these laws. The study emphasizes the importance of understanding the financial implications of mental health policy changes (Haffajee et al., 2019). The U.S. mental healthcare system can benefit from the policy analysis and suggestions provided by the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), which provides insights into potential challenges and opportunities for improvement. These analyses help policymakers understand the impacts of proposed changes, including access, affordability, and quality of services (Haselden et al., 2019). 

Conclusion

In conclusion, this comprehensive proposal advocates for a transformative shift in mental health care, emphasizing evidence-based changes, increased accessibility, and awareness campaigns. By learning from global models such as Germany and France, addressing inequalities, and considering financial implications, the suggested reforms aim to enhance mental health outcomes in the U.S. Despite potential challenges, the commitment to funding, innovative strategies, and a multidisciplinary approach positions this proposal to make a meaningful impact on the public mental wellbeing.

References

 Alegría, M., Zhen-Duan, J., O’Malley, I. S., & DiMarzio, K. (2022). A new agenda for optimizing investments in community mental health and reducing disparities. American Journal of Psychiatry, 179(6), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.21100970  Busch, S. H., & Kyanko, K. (2021). Assessment of perceptions of mental health vs medical health plan networks among US adults with private insurance. JAMA Network Open, 4(10), e2130770. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30770 

NURS FPX 6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change

Busch, S. H., & Kyanko, K. A. (2020). Incorrect provider directories associated with out-of-network mental health care and outpatient surprise bills. Health Affairs, 39(6), 975–983. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01501  CDC. (2023, April 25). About Mental Health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth/learn/index.htm  Crane, L., Adams, F., Harper, G., Welch, J., & Pellicano, E. (2019). “Something needs to change”: Mental health experiences of young autistic adults in England. Autism, 23(2), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318757048  Dalgleish, T., Black, M., Johnston, D., & Bevan, A. (2020). Transdiagnostic approaches to mental health problems: Current status and future directions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 88(3), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000482  Drissi, N., Ouhbi, S., Janati Idrissi, M. A., Fernandez-Luque, L., & Ghogho, M. (2020). Connected mental health: Systematic mapping study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e19950. https://doi.org/10.2196/19950  Fahy, K., Alexiou, A., Daras, K., Mason, K., Bennett, D., Taylor-Robinson, D., & Barr, B. (2023). Mental health impact of cuts to local government spending on cultural, environmental and planning services in England: A longitudinal ecological study. BMC Public Health, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16340-0  Haffajee, R. L., Mello, M. M., Zhang, F., Busch, A. B., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Wharam, J. F. (2019). Association of federal mental health parity legislation with health care use and spending among high utilizers of services. Medical Care, 57(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000001076  Haselden, M., Brister, T., Robinson, S., Covell, N., Pauselli, L., & Dixon, L. (2019). Effectiveness of the NAMI homefront program for military and veteran families: In-person and online benefits. Psychiatric Services, 70(10), 935–939. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800573 

NURS FPX 6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change

Knapp, M., & Wong, G. (2020). Economics and mental health: The current scenario. World Psychiatry, 19(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20692  R, Salvador-Carulla, L., Salinas-Pérez, J. A., García-Alonso, C. R., Cid, J., Salazzari, D., Montagni, I., Tedeschi, F., Cetrano, G., Chevreul, K., Kalseth, J., Hagmair, G., Straßmayr, C., Park, A. L., Sfectu, R., Ala-Nikkola, T., González-Caballero, J. L., Rabbi, L., Kalseth, B., & Amaddeo, F. (2019). Standard comparison of local mental health care systems in eight European countries. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 28(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796017000415 McGINTY, B. (2023). The Future of Public Mental Health: Challenges and Opportunities. 101(S1), 532–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12622  Molfenter, T., Heitkamp, T., Murphy, A. A., Tapscott, S., Behlman, S., & Cody, O. J. (2021). Use of telehealth in mental health (MH) services during and after COVID-19. Community Mental Health Journal, 57(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-021-00861-2  Moroz, N., Moroz, I., & Slovinec D’Angelo, M. (2020). Mental health services in Canada: Barriers and cost-effective solutions to increase access. Healthcare Management Forum, 33(6), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470420933911  Nelson, C. W., Kelly, S., Kennedy, M., & Cherrie, J. (2019). A scoping review mapping research on green space and associated mental health benefits. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(12), 2081. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122081  Otten, D., Tibubos, A. N., Schomerus, G., Brähler, E., Binder, H., Kruse, J., Ladwig, K.-H., Wild, P. S., Grabe, H. J., & Beutel, M. E. (2021). Similarities and differences of mental health in women and men: A systematic review of findings in three large German cohorts. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.553071  Planey, A. M., Smith, S. M., Moore, S., & Walker, T. D. (2019). Barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking among African American youth and their families: A systematic review study. Children and Youth Services Review, 101, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.04.001  Sneha, C. R., Reddy, M. M., Nongmeikapam, M., & Narayana, J. S. (2019). Awareness and attitude toward mental illness among a rural population in Kolar. Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry, 35(1), 69–69. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijsp.ijsp_23_18 

NURS FPX 6218 Assessment 1 Proposing Evidence-Based Change

Țăran, A.-M., Mustea, L., Vătavu, S., Lobonț, O.-R., & Luca, M.-M. (2022). Challenges and drawbacks of the EU medical system generated by the COVID-19 Pandemic in the field of health systems’ Digitalization. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 4950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19094950  Thom, J., Mauz, E., Peitz, D., Kersjes, C., Aichberger, M., Baumeister, H., Bramesfeld, A., Daszkowski, J., Eichhorn, T., Gaebel, W., Härter, M., Jacobi, F., Kuhn, J., Lindert, J., Margraf, J., Melchior, H., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Nebe, A., Orpana, H., & Peth, J. (2021). Establishing a mental health surveillance in Germany: Development of a framework concept and indicator set. Journal of Health Monitoring, 6(4), 34–63. https://doi.org/10.25646/8861  Varga, T. V., Bu, F., Dissing, A. S., Elsenburg, L. K., Bustamante, J. J. H., Matta, J., Zon, S. K. R. van, Brouwer, S., Bültmann, U., Fancourt, D., Hoeyer, K., Goldberg, M., Melchior, M., Strandberg-Larsen, K., Zins, M., Clotworthy, A., & Rod, N. H. (2021). Loneliness, worries, anxiety, and precautionary behaviours in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal analysis of 200,000 Western and Northern Europeans. The Lancet Regional Health – Europe, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2020.100020  Velasco, A. A., Cruz, I. S. S., Billings, J., Jimenez, M., & Rowe, S. (2020). What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02659-0