NURS FPX 6105 Assessment 4 Assessment Strategies and Complete Course Plan

Name

Capella university

NURS-FPX 6105 Teaching and Active Learning Strategies

Prof. Name

Date

Assessment Strategies and Complete Course Plan

Teaching Chronic Disease Management (CDM) within nursing curricula equips future nurses with the competencies required for managing long-term health conditions. This course plan integrates evidence-based assessment methods designed to measure student knowledge, clinical decision-making skills, and application of theory in practice. The approach emphasizes maintaining an engaging and inclusive classroom through effective management and motivational strategies (Murtagh et al., 2021). The program also considers potential obstacles such as socioeconomic, cultural, and social challenges, with an emphasis on promoting cultural competence. The overarching goal is to prepare students for professional nursing practice within varied healthcare environments by applying comprehensive evaluations and assessment tools tailored to CDM competencies.

This CDM course design takes a holistic approach, combining evidence-based teaching methods with learner-centered strategies. It promotes cultural awareness and addresses educational barriers while ensuring students are well-equipped to provide quality care across diverse patient populations.

Theory to Optimize Teaching Experience and Learning Outcomes

The Social Learning Theory (SLT) is particularly suitable for enhancing educational experiences in CDM nursing programs. This theory prioritizes social interaction and observational learning, both vital in healthcare education where students must handle complex patient scenarios (Rumjaun & Narod, 2020). SLT emphasizes the value of role modeling, allowing educators to demonstrate professional behavior, clinical reasoning, and patient-centered care approaches.

Incorporating SLT into teaching practices involves fostering collaborative, interactive learning environments. Activities such as group discussions, simulations, and role-plays enable students to engage actively with both the material and their peers. This approach also integrates practical opportunities where students can observe clinical scenarios, enhancing their confidence and competence (Hwang et al., 2022).

Furthermore, SLT acknowledges the cognitive processes involved in learning, such as motivation, attention, and memory retention. By incorporating participatory and engaging lessons, educators can effectively stimulate students’ intrinsic motivation and support cognitive mastery. These teaching moments not only build clinical skills but also cultivate self-efficacy, equipping learners to navigate the demanding environment of CDM nursing.

Table 1: Application of SLT in CDM Nursing Education

SLT Component	Application Example in CDM Teaching	Expected Outcome
Observational Learning	Clinical demonstrations and peer role-modeling	Improved clinical judgment and empathy
Role Modeling	Instructor-led simulations	Development of professional behaviors
Reinforcement	Positive feedback during case-based learning	Enhanced motivation and confidence
Collaborative Learning	Group care plan development	Increased teamwork and critical thinking

Rationale for Theory

Adopting SLT in CDM nursing education provides a framework for nurturing professional competence through collaborative learning, role modeling, and observational experiences. These instructional strategies improve students’ abilities to deliver patient-centered care. By observing healthcare professionals and participating in guided practice, students gain essential communication, problem-solving, and patient management skills (Murtagh et al., 2021).

The theory’s emphasis on enhancing cognitive functions like self-efficacy is equally important. It helps students gain confidence in handling the complexities of chronic illness care (Rumjaun & Narod, 2020). SLT-based teaching practices also encourage knowledge-sharing among peers, promoting both individual mastery and collective learning, ultimately leading to better patient care outcomes.

Thinking, Learning, and Communicating Methods for Specific Learning Situations

Effective CDM nursing education involves applying a variety of instructional methods tailored to meet diverse learning preferences and enhance engagement. Evidence-based strategies include didactic lectures, case-based learning, and interactive simulations, which help students develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills (Pramesworo et al., 2023).

Theories like Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT) offer valuable insights into learner motivation. SDT emphasizes intrinsic motivation and the importance of autonomy and choice, while EVT highlights the significance of perceived task value and expectancy of success in shaping learning engagement (Yue & Lu, 2022; Eccles & Wigfield, 2020). Educators can increase motivation by clearly linking course content to real-world nursing practice and providing students with meaningful, autonomy-supportive learning opportunities.

Moreover, the role of Social Learning Theory is indispensable in shaping how students acquire knowledge in clinical education. By integrating opportunities for students to observe expert practitioners and engage in guided practice, educators can improve knowledge retention and skill acquisition (Yılmaz & Yılmaz, 2019).

Table 2: Teaching and Learning Methods in CDM Nursing Education

Method	Purpose	Example Activity
Didactic Lectures	Provide foundational knowledge	Introduction to chronic disease processes
Case-Based Learning	Develop problem-solving and clinical reasoning skills	Care plan development for a patient case
Simulation-Based Training	Foster hands-on skill development in a safe environment	Managing a simulated diabetic crisis
Group Discussions	Promote knowledge exchange and teamwork	Case scenario debates

By blending these educational approaches and motivational frameworks, CDM nursing programs can optimize student engagement, learning outcomes, and professional readiness.

Nursing and Healthcare Teaching Strategies, Techniques, and Outcomes

Learning Strategies and Techniques

In CDM nursing programs, diverse instructional strategies are essential to address varying learning needs and preferences. Lectures offer foundational theoretical knowledge on chronic conditions and evidence-based care strategies (Boeykens et al., 2022). Case studies promote analytical thinking as students design personalized care plans, while simulations provide opportunities to practice decision-making in realistic clinical settings (Pramesworo et al., 2023). These varied methods foster active participation and accommodate different learning styles, enhancing overall student competence.

Learning Outcomes

Students will participate in learning activities such as lectures, case studies, and simulations to grasp the pathophysiology and evidence-based management of chronic illnesses. Critical thinking will be assessed through care plan submissions and scenario analyses. Communication skills will be cultivated via role-plays and interprofessional collaborations, while cultural competence will be developed through workshops and reflective practices (Rahemi & Williams, 2020).

Table 3: Learning Outcomes and Evaluation Methods

Learning Outcome	Method of Evaluation
Understanding of chronic diseases	Written exams, care plans
Application of critical thinking	Scenario analyses, simulation exercises
Effective communication skills	Role-plays, group discussions
Development of cultural competence	Reflection papers, workshops

Populations and Situations

Learning strategies should be adapted according to student demographics and learning environments. For example, collaborative learning activities and peer teaching can be highly effective for culturally diverse student populations (Ali et al., 2022). Online modules offer flexibility for learners juggling professional and personal commitments, while interactive simulations can be particularly beneficial for kinesthetic learners (Neuwirth et al., 2020).

Assumptions

These teaching strategies operate under the assumption that students possess a foundational understanding of basic nursing principles and have completed prerequisite coursework in anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology. Additionally, it assumes students are motivated, career-driven, and open to collaborative and active learning (Boeykens et al., 2022).

Cultural Competence in Nursing and Healthcare Educational Offerings

Cultural competence plays a pivotal role in preparing nursing and healthcare students to deliver effective care to individuals from diverse cultural, ethnic, and social backgrounds. Within CDM (Chronic Disease Management) nursing education, this concept ensures that future nurses are equipped to recognize and honor the varied values, beliefs, and preferences of patients, particularly those managing chronic illnesses (Rahemi & Williams, 2020). Integrating culturally responsive teaching strategies — including incorporating diverse cultural perspectives and offering language assistance — fosters inclusive learning environments where students from varied backgrounds can thrive (Campos et al., 2021). These inclusive educational settings enhance students’ ability to engage meaningfully and comprehend complex healthcare topics.

Cultural competence extends beyond theoretical instruction into clinical practice. Nursing students must acquire the competencies necessary to navigate cultural differences effectively in patient care environments. A deep understanding of patients’ cultural norms, traditions, and health-related beliefs not only enables nurses to deliver culturally appropriate care but also strengthens the patient-provider relationship (Murtagh et al., 2021). Additionally, embedding cultural competence within nursing education encourages a critical understanding of health disparities and social determinants of health, enabling students to advocate for equitable care delivery and improved access to health services for marginalized populations (Rahemi & Williams, 2020).

Furthermore, promoting cultural competence contributes to enhancing interprofessional collaboration within healthcare teams. In CDM programs, students frequently participate in multidisciplinary care teams where effective communication and teamwork with colleagues from diverse backgrounds are essential (Murtagh et al., 2021). By fostering cultural awareness and communication skills, educators prepare students to work cohesively with professionals from various cultural settings, ensuring patient-centered care that respects individual values and traditions (Campos et al., 2021). In summary, prioritizing cultural competence in healthcare education ensures that future nurses deliver compassionate, equitable care to a culturally varied patient population.

Evaluating Evidence

The evidence supporting the integration of cultural competence in healthcare education is both timely and credible, primarily sourced from peer-reviewed research published in recognized academic journals. These studies offer reliable, comprehensive insights into how cultural competence benefits both educational outcomes and patient care (Neuwirth et al., 2020). By reviewing existing literature, it becomes clear that embedding cultural awareness within curricula enhances students’ cultural sensitivity, improves patient-provider relationships, and reduces healthcare disparities.

This body of evidence is adequate to inform nursing educators and curriculum developers on best practices for promoting cultural competence in their teaching (Neuwirth et al., 2020). It provides a foundation for developing instructional strategies, assessment methods, and clinical simulations tailored to address the cultural dimensions of patient care. In addition, these findings advocate for the adoption of evidence-based teaching approaches to nurture culturally responsive healthcare practitioners capable of addressing complex health inequities in practice.

Teaching Plan

The teaching plan functions as a structured framework designed to address the educational challenges of chronic disease management in nursing. It sets out clear objectives and aligns teaching methods with evidence-based practices and cultural considerations to optimize student learning. The plan emphasizes integrating cultural competence into every aspect of instruction, ensuring nursing students are well-equipped to manage chronic diseases in diverse patient populations (Abate et al., 2022).

To present this information clearly, the teaching plan components are organized in the table below:

Table 1

Teaching Plan Overview

Section	Content Description
Introduction	Introduces the teaching plan’s objectives and its relevance in chronic disease education (Hensel & Billings, 2020).
Learning Outcomes	Defines the specific knowledge, skills, and professional attitudes to be gained by students (Hensel & Billings, 2020).
Learning Theory Application	Details the use of Social Learning Theory to shape instructional approaches and student engagement (Tan et al., 2021).
Teaching Strategies	Outlines diverse methods such as simulations, lectures, and group discussions for effective learning (Hensel & Billings, 2020).
Classroom Management	Describes strategies for maintaining structure, setting expectations, and fostering a positive classroom atmosphere (Savitsky et al., 2020).
Learner Motivation	Highlights motivational techniques like positive reinforcement and goal-setting to improve participation (Tan et al., 2021).
Barriers to Learning	Identifies potential obstacles including resource scarcity and cultural differences, along with strategies to mitigate them (Savitsky et al., 2020).
Integration of Cultural Competence	Emphasizes methods to embed cultural competence into curriculum design and clinical training (Savitsky et al., 2020).
Evaluation	Specifies assessment tools and strategies to measure student achievement and teaching plan effectiveness (Tan et al., 2021).
Conclusion	Summarizes the plan’s significance in preparing students for effective chronic illness management (Cañadas, 2021).

Assessment Design for Course

Assessment design within the CDM course incorporates both formative and summative strategies to effectively measure student learning and competency development. Formative assessments such as quizzes, group discussions, and case-based exercises are distributed throughout the course to continuously gauge students’ comprehension and application of knowledge. Summative assessments are strategically placed at major course milestones and include written exams, clinical simulations, and practical demonstrations to evaluate overall student proficiency (Cañadas, 2021).

These assessments are carefully aligned with the course’s learning outcomes and competencies, ensuring they accurately reflect the students’ grasp of key CDM concepts. Recognizing the diversity within the student population, the assessments are tailored to accommodate different learning styles and preferences. For instance, visual learners might benefit from diagram-based questions, while auditory learners may prefer oral presentations or debates (Savitsky et al., 2020).

Additionally, the assessments are designed with cultural sensitivity in mind. Scenarios and case studies presented in exams and simulations are structured to resonate with students from diverse cultural backgrounds. This inclusivity ensures fairness and equity in evaluation while enhancing students’ cultural awareness and sensitivity (Tan et al., 2021). Furthermore, real-world healthcare scenarios are incorporated to prepare students for the complexities of chronic disease management in diverse patient populations. By utilizing a range of evidence-based assessment techniques, educators can provide valuable feedback to learners, identify areas needing improvement, and ensure students are thoroughly prepared for clinical practice (Abate et al., 2022).

Summary

To conclude, the CDM course provides nursing students with comprehensive training in managing patients with chronic health conditions. Through the integration of evidence-based teaching strategies, culturally inclusive learning environments, and structured teaching plans, students develop essential clinical and interpersonal skills. The curriculum incorporates varied instructional methods and Social Learning Theory principles, along with proactive classroom and learner management techniques emphasizing positive reinforcement and clear expectations.

Barriers to learning, including cultural and resource-based challenges, are addressed strategically to support all learners. Integrating cultural competence throughout both instructional content and clinical practice enhances students’ preparedness for professional practice in diverse healthcare settings. Finally, the course’s carefully designed assessments offer meaningful, culturally sensitive evaluations of student progress, ensuring that graduates are well-equipped to improve patient outcomes and provide equitable, compassionate care in the management of chronic diseases.

References

Abate, H., Yohanes, Y., & Gebrie, M. (2022). Clinical decision making approaches and associated factors among nurses working in a tertiary teaching hospital. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2022.100432

Ali, S., Sultan, M., & Rafiq, M. (2022). Open education resources’ benefits and challenges in the academic world: A systematic review. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 73(3), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-02-2022-0049

NURS FPX 6105 Assessment 4 Assessment Strategies and Complete Course Plan

Boeykens, D., Boeckxstaens, P., De Sutter, A., Lahousse, L., Pype, P., De Vriendt, P., & Van de Velde, D. (2022). Goal-oriented care for patients with chronic conditions or multimorbidity in primary care: A scoping review and concept analysis. PLOS ONE, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262843

Campos, A., Hopkins, M., & Quaynor, L. (2021). Linguistically responsive teaching in preservice teacher education: A review of the literature through the lens of cultural-historical activity theory. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118808785

Cañadas, L. (2021). Contribution of formative assessment for developing teaching competences in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1950684

Dong, Y., Yin, H., Du, S., & Wang, A. (2021). The effects of flipped classroom characterized by situational and collaborative learning in a community nursing course: A quasi-experimental design. Nurse Education Today, 105, 105037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105037

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859

Flaherty, E., & Bartels, S. J. (2019). Addressing the community‐based geriatric healthcare workforce shortage by leveraging the potential of interprofessional teams. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 67(S2), S400–S408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15924

Hensel, D., & Billings, D. M. (2020). Strategies to teach the national council of state boards of nursing clinical judgment model. Nurse Educator, 45(3), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000773

Hwang, G.-J., Chang, C.-Y., & Ogata, H. (2022). The effectiveness of the virtual patient-based social learning approach in undergraduate nursing education: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105164

Murtagh, S., McCombe, G., Broughan, J., Carroll, Á., Casey, M., Harrold, Á., Dennehy, T., Fawsitt, R., & Cullen, W. (2021). Integrating primary and secondary care to enhance chronic disease management: A scoping review. International Journal of Integrated Care, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5508

Neuwirth, L. S., Jović, S., & Mukherji, B. R. (2020). Reimagining higher education during and post-COVID-19: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 27(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477971420947738

NURS FPX 6105 Assessment 4 Assessment Strategies and Complete Course Plan

Nishina, A., Lewis, J. A., Bellmore, A., & Witkow, M. R. (2019). Ethnic diversity and inclusive school environments. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1633923

O’Leary, E. S., Shapiro, C., Toma, S., Sayson, H. W., Fitzgerald, M., Johnson, T., & Sork, V. L. (2020). Creating inclusive classrooms by engaging STEM faculty in culturally responsive teaching workshops. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00230-7

Pramesworo, I. S., Sembiring, D., Sarip, M., Lolang, E., & Fathurrochman, I. (2023). Identification of new approaches to information technology-based teaching for successful teaching of millennial generation entering 21st century education. Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i1.2722

Rumjaun, A., & Narod, F. (2020). Social learning theory—Albert Bandura. Springer Texts in Education, 1(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_7

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Savitsky, B., Findling, Y., Ereli, A., & Hendel, T. (2020). Anxiety and coping strategies among nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurse Education in Practice, 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102809

Schieltz, K. M., Wacker, D. P., Suess, A. N., Graber, J. E., Lustig, N. H., & Detrick, J. (2020). Evaluating the effects of positive reinforcement, instructional strategies, and negative reinforcement on problem behavior and academic performance: An experimental analysis. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 32(2), 339–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09696-y

Stevenson, N. A., VanLone, J., & Barber, B. R. (2020). A commentary on the misalignment of teacher education and the need for classroom behavior management skills. Education and Treatment of Children, 43(4), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-020-00031-1

Tan, M. W., Lim, F. P., Siew, A., Levett-Jones, T., Chua, W. L., & Liaw, S. Y. (2021). Why are physical assessment skills not practiced? A systematic review with implications for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104759

Yue, Y., & Lu, J. (2022). International students’ motivation to study abroad: An empirical study based on expectancy-value theory and self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841122