NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Name

Capella university

NURS-FPX 6107 Curriculum Design, Development, and Evaluation

Prof. Name

Date

Curriculum Evaluation

The review of a nursing curriculum thoroughly examines the program’s success, significance, and results. It ensures that the curriculum is aligned with the latest healthcare priorities, industry standards, and expectations for regulation. With the fast changes in healthcare, nurse educators need to periodically review and update their curricula better to accommodate science, technology, and societal needs. This process promotes the sophistication of nursing education in equipping recent graduates to adapt to the complexities and changes in healthcare (Nouraey et al., 2020).

Curriculum evaluation of nursing education involves process, formative, and summative assessments. Process evaluation concerns the methodology of delivering the curriculum, examining teaching approaches, and resource allocation. Formative evaluation happens during the delivery of instructions and is in continuous feedback that should guide immediate refinement. This method is important in identifying weaknesses in a curriculum. It allows a more dynamic and adaptive educational framework (Nouraey et al., 2020). Moreover, summative evaluation occurs at the end of the schooling cycle. It measures the curriculum’s overall achievements concerning the objectives and learning the students attained.

Curriculum review is the underpinning through which nursing education programs would be seen to ensure full compliance with professional standards. It is the adaptation of changes in the healthcare requirements of individuals. It identifies strengths and areas for improvement. It enables program improvement and ensures compliance with accreditation standards. Continuous and cyclical assessments maintain educational quality and facilitate continual development. It ensures that curricula are consistent to the active requirements of organizations and the medical field (Nouraey et al., 2020).

This evaluation is a sequel to previous course structure and curriculum design analyses. It addresses the issue of continuous curriculum review and identifies vital aspects of good assessment. It analyzes pilot testing and differentiates short and long evaluations. It also accentuates evidence-based approaches in curriculum development and names major accrediting agencies and requirements. The curriculum must surpass the established benchmarks to prepare compassionate, competent, and adaptable nursing experts.

Significance of Constant Curriculum Assessment

The ongoing curriculum review ensures that nursing education programs are well-informed of changing healthcare needs, technological developments, and regulatory requirements. Lecturers constantly evaluate teaching methods, content, and clinical experiences to maximize learning outcomes.

Importance and Stakeholders

Ongoing curriculum review regularly allows educators to identify gaps or outdated practices and provide timely interventions. It keeps the program quality and relevant. This process ensures nursing education is responsive to emerging healthcare challenges and prepares students for the dynamic setting they will enter upon graduation. This assessment is key for diverse stakeholders, including nursing students, faculty, healthcare employers, and accrediting bodies (Giddens et al., 2022). The Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN) are the keys to recognizing organizations. It mandates steady assessments to uphold authorization. Ongoing curriculum review also incorporates technology advancements.

It updates nursing programs on digital equipment, simulation-based learning, and electronic data practices (Giddens et al., 2022). This trains students to master technological skills to help them navigate modern healthcare environments and enhances the delivery of instruction in a fast-moving profession. For students, it guarantees they gain the skills and knowledge needed for safe and effective care. Faculty benefit from insights into teaching success and areas for expert growth. Healthcare employers are confident that graduates are prepared for the demands of this industry (Giddens et al., 2022).

Curriculum evaluation also enhances stakeholder accountability and promotes continuous improvement. It proves a loyalty to excellence and awareness of meeting the needs of all stakeholders. Formative evaluations provide prompt feedback to educators so they can adjust and correct curricula at the right moment (Nouraey et al., 2020). This ensures that gaps are quickly identified and corrected, optimizing the learning experience and improving students’ outcomes.

Consequences of Neglecting Evaluation

Course assessment is vital to preserving the standard of the medical program. Outdated curricula fail to meet the evolving demands of the healthcare workforce. It places graduates unprepared for modern clinical challenges. This disconnect risks accreditation and erodes stakeholder satisfaction, including students, faculty, and employers. It compromises the ability to produce competent professionals. The lack of updates also fails to incorporate innovations. It includes electronic data and the digital health system, thus making students unprepared to face modern healthcare settings (Booth et al., 2021).

Avoiding assessment excludes critical issues, such as cultural competence and ethical decision-making. It limits graduates’ abilities to provide inclusive care for their patients. A good assessment helps the nursing programs stay relevant to the needs of the industry, encourages innovations, and equips the students for practice within an ever-changing healthcare setting (Booth et al., 2021).

Without formative evaluation, the opportunity to detect and correct deficiencies during instruction is eliminated. Curriculum weaknesses hinder the development of nursing student skills and knowledge can persist (Nouraey et al., 2020). Continuous curriculum assessment is required to maintain nursing education’s relevance, quality and effectiveness. This ensures alignment with advancing healthcare practice, reestablishes accountability to stakeholders, and promotes ongoing improvement. Failure to prioritize this crucial task would lead to an outdated curriculum, problems with accreditations, stakeholder unhappiness, and lost chances at enhancing education achievements.

Important Criteria in Curriculum Assessment

Nursing curriculum evaluation is important for relevancy, quality, and responsiveness to health industry needs. The designed curriculum should meet the changing needs of the healthcare environment. It reflects up-to-date developments in medical practice, technology and patient care. One of the major criteria of this review would be the alignment of the curriculum with industry standards and accrediting bodies such as the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) (Deborah et al., 2020). Its alignment is ensured to guarantee that the program adheres to established standards. It provides students with the skills required by the healthcare system. It ensures that graduate nurses can provide safe, quality care that meets regulatory needs.

The second criterion is the infusion of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) into the nursing curriculum. EBP ensures nursing students learn to apply the best available research and clinical guidelines to patient care. An example of this could be where students critically review current studies on pain management techniques and infection control practices. This infusion of evidence-based information within the curriculum encourages a culture of continuing education (Savic, 2020). Nurses will continue to stay abreast of advancements in clinical practice. Moreover, it prepares a student for evidence-based decision-making skills that help maximize improved patient outcomes and facilitate effective care delivery.

Another important consideration is integration with clinical practice. Clinical practice is integrated with the underlying theory, and students must have chances to apply foundational knowledge in actual practice. For example, clinical placement in organizations, healthcare centers and public centers enables students to apply theoretical aspects to real-world settings. Simulation laboratories serve as a safe space for students to train and hone such skills as injecting or assessing patients before working with real patients (Koukourikos et al., 2021). The balance ensures that graduates are set to deal effectively with care challenges.

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Besides these foundational components, the curriculum must emphasize inclusiveness and cultural competency to prepare nurses for interdisciplinary healthcare settings. A curriculum that includes diverse patient populations, cultural competency, and health disparities provides nursing students with the competencies to care for individuals from different backgrounds. For instance, education on the artistic needs of the immigrant group or the challenges specific to rural settings. It enables students to recognize health inequities (Savic, 2020). The curriculum component improves the care quality delivered to patients from different cultural backgrounds while promoting an empathetic, culturally conscious, patient-centered nursing workforce.

Lastly, a nursing curriculum should be designed with an aspect of technology by incorporating digital health tools into clinical practice. Nursing students must be trained in informatics, electronic data integration, and wearable health devices. These aspects have gained the most popularity and may shape healthcare delivery systems and improve patient care. A good example may be using these systems for accurate records documentation or conducting an electronic data consultation to ascertain patients’ needs from a distance (Koukourikos et al., 2021). Being exposed to digital tools readies healthcare practices for better efficiency and prepares students for application at a time when the health field is rapidly shifting its pace in technology. 

A nursing curriculum evaluation includes several criteria to ensure the curriculum is adequate for preparing nursing students to face the challenges of their profession. It includes aligning with industry standards, integrating evidence-based practice, and teaching actual and theoretical training. It fosters cultural skills and integrates technology as a core feature. By addressing these aspects, nursing programs can produce well-rounded, highly skilled professionals prepared to provide safe and compassionate care to a diverse patient population.

 Pilot Testing in Program Assessment

Pilot testing is an integral part of nursing curriculum evaluation. It systematically tests the efficacy of re-designed teaching methods and tools in a smaller group before rollout to a wider audience. The preliminary trial involves the selection of a trial of representative learners to reflect the variety and features of the large group so that the results are extensively appropriate. The selected cohort experiences the program in a somewhat life-like environment. It takes advantage of the delivery strategies and pacing for the final version. Surveys, interviews, focus groups, and direct observations gather comprehensive information on student and instructor feedback, performance metrics, and operational issues (Cieslowski et al., 2023). Pilot testing can help raise key problems in the early stages of the design process.

The educators corrected these issues regarding the incoherence of content, poor course design, lack of required resources, and ineffective teaching methodologies well before their impact on the student population. This makes the process less interrupted. It also allows the time for evidence-based adjustments to improve the learning outcomes. At this point, the interplay between the students and faculty’s opinions can prove particularly useful in informing a well-structured yet more student-centered program. Pilot testing also assures that the curriculum meets the requirements of both academic standards and actual needs in the healthcare sector (Cieslowski et al., 2023). For example, the infusion of education about informatics into nursing curricula was directly inspired by the pandemic. 

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

A study that surveyed 386 nursing programs identified that 21% of the prelicensure and 46% of the BSN programs intended to include technology training within their curricula (Eckhoff et al., 2022). Variability in experiences and the availability of resources made it difficult, shedding light on the need for pilot testing to assess the feasibility and best practice refinements. This strategy enables institutions to determine the flexibility of the curriculum against the dynamic healthcare setting while reducing risks associated with mass deployment. 

A practical application of pilot testing is illustrated with a simulation module intended to train nursing students on emergencies like cardiac arrest. During the pilot study, the participants were involved in simulated activities such as fast assessment of vital signs, execution of CPR, and effective communication among the healthcare team (Koukourikos et al., 2021). Feedback from students and lecturers was built upon and included factors such as improving the realism of scenarios and equipment. Later adjustments ensured that the simulation better mirrored real-life stress and urgency.

It enhanced the clinical decision-making and confidence of the students. This also promotes a culture of continuous improvement, supporting faculty development through pilot testing. It allows educators to change their teaching methods and better understand student needs. It makes the curriculum flexible and inclusive. In addition, it promotes effective resource allocation for the technologies and materials themselves to support student learning. Involving students and faculty enhances stakeholder engagement, resulting in greater buy-in and commitment to the final curriculum (Koukourikos et al., 2021). Pilot testing ensures a high-quality educational experience by systematically addressing challenges, aligning with healthcare standards, and equipping students to excel in dynamic clinical environments. 

Short-term and Long-term Assessments for Process Development

Curriculum development should be dynamic, incorporating short-term and long-term evaluations to improve and align with educational objectives continuously. Short-term evaluation focuses on immediate outcomes. It expounds on the operational aspects involved with implementing a curriculum. For instance, in the introduction of a new module on informatics, short-term evaluations could mean conducting weekly polls to assess students’ understanding of virtual care principles and the usability of electronic health data integration. These assessments help pinpoint early challenges, whether technically driven or due to ambiguity in content clarity (Singh & Haynes, 2020). Educators can make the necessary changes immediately to enhance the learning experience and ensure the smooth delivery of instructional material. The long-term evaluation looks into the larger issues the curriculum produces while helping examine cohorts. It evaluates its effectiveness in meeting the dynamic industry demands.

Monitoring graduates’ readiness to apply artificial intelligence in clinical decision-making would be invaluable. Five years after graduation, their ability will be polished to adapt to developing healthcare technologies. Such assessments involve assessing performance on licensure exams, employer opinion of job readiness, and longitudinal studies of career progression (Singh & Haynes, 2020). It establishes a revised curriculum that equips graduates with the skills required to succeed in health. Solid processes implemented according to each phase can ease these appraisals.

Learning Management Systems (LMS) analytics analyses can provide instantaneous feedback on student engagement and performance for short-term evaluation. Debriefing sessions of structured reflection with faculty after simulations can be used to pinpoint areas in need of immediate adjustment. For a long-term assessment, incorporating alumni tracking systems and employer surveys into institutional review practices will allow for an in-depth analysis of the continued relevance and impact of the curriculum (Manzanares et al., 2020). Conversely, benchmarking against national standards, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing ensures the curriculum stays current and competitive. Balancing short-term responsiveness with long-term strategic insight, curriculum development represents an iterative endeavor that favors innovation and can change accordingly to emerging trends while guaranteeing students will be prepared for future healthcare challenges.

Evidence-Based Nursing Concepts in Program Development

The curriculum development process highly influences evidence-based nursing principles, theories, and best practices to maintain and keep educational programs current and efficient. It promotes new industry standards and healthcare advancements. Integrating evidence-based practice into curriculum design will improve learning outcomes. It prepares nurses to perform modern practices in a health setting and helps students develop abilities for practical conclusions. Practical medical views use the most recent findings and best possible indication to notify medical systems and teaching approaches (Baker et al., 2021). In curriculum development, this would mean infusing healthcare trends, care of patient innovations, and technological developments into course content.

Integrating the “Healthcare Informatics” course into a BSN degree program. This course explores how health informatics can be applied to better the care of the patient and the facilitation of healthcare delivery. As the healthcare industry relies on technology and information to produce better outcomes, nursing students must understand health information systems and their involvement in clinical practice (Sapci & Sapci, 2020). Medical philosophies comprise outlines of leader prospectus growth by describing singularities and relations inside medical settings. 

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Models like Watson’s Theory of Human Caring or Benner’s Novice to Expert theory shape prospectus constructions emphasizing all-inclusive care development (Bagheri et al., 2023). Such philosophies assist learners in creating medical knowledge that helps develop understanding, scientific competencies, and moral conclusions. Best practices in medical education focus on evidence-based instructional techniques, assessment techniques, and learning activities. It brings about maximal student engagement as well as good retention of knowledge. Best practices for learning-and-teaching processes involve learning-centered approaches, active learning, and simulation to train students in clinical scenario practice.

For instance, teaching advanced clinical skills in high-fidelity simulation exercises provides students with a safe opportunity to apply evidence-based guidelines to the care of patients (Koukourikos et al., 2021). A highly emphasized area when developing curricula is that of patient safety education. Preparing students to prevent and respond to healthcare errors and communicate effectively. Maintaining the highest standards of care would be impossible without incorporating patient safety into nursing programs. Integrating this focus into nursing education ensures that future nurses are equipped to handle the complexities of the modern healthcare environment. 

Evidence-based curriculum development also means constant and dynamic improvement based on continuous stakeholder feedback, educational research, and healthcare trends. Constant updates in content curricula relevant to new clinical guidelines or emerging research ensure that nursing education is appropriate and consistent with ongoing medical practice trends. Integrating evidence-based nursing concepts, theories, best practices, and patient safety education will help educators instill critical thinking skills in students and equip them with knowledge and abilities (Baker et al., 2021). 

Authorization Assessment Criteria

Nursing programs uphold high educational quality and excellence standards. It identifies the correct accreditation agency and what standards review will focus on if necessary. Accreditation provides formal assurance that academic institutions and their programs meet benchmark requirements set by accrediting organizations, ensuring graduates are adequately prepared for practice. For the proposed “Healthcare Informatics” course to be integrated into the BSN curriculum at the University of San Francisco (Sapci & Sapci, 2020).

The accrediting bodies that would be best suited would be the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) or the Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN). These institutions are recognized nationally for accrediting medical prospectus through a strict process, thus maintaining superior academic standards. The AACN accredits the program with some criteria, which include institutional resources, curriculum structure, teaching methods and institutional governance. Similarly, ACEN evaluates programs on its curriculum, teaching approaches, student results, faculty credentials, and ongoing quality improvement practices (Budin, 2022).

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Core competencies and professional standards tied to accreditation criteria. It tends to mandate programs to align with such. The accreditation criteria for the “Healthcare Informatics” course will thus reflect requirements to incorporate evidence-based practices. It includes Electronic Health Records (EHRs), data medical exchange, and information analytics in decisions. The legality, ethics, and regulatory considerations of health informatics will also be considered as part of the course to prepare the student to act wisely in the controversies of digital health technologies (Sapci & Sapci, 2020).

Consequently, accreditation criteria will focus on course alignment with national health priorities, faculty expertise in healthcare informatics, the provision of appropriate clinical placement or simulation resources to support training in EHR and comprehensive assessment methods of competencies in advanced technologies and patient care. The findings will be used as a guide by institutions toward continuous improvements in the curricula after the completion of the accreditation evaluation.

All identified areas of non-compliance or opportunities for improvement would receive specific action plans. For instance, professional development programs of recruitment for the faculty would be implemented so that faculty strength could be bolstered in informatics. The results also call for adjustments in what and how it is taught to ensure that accreditation bodies or the healthcare sector’s dynamic nature are met. The “Healthcare Informatics” course can entail updating course materials about new trends and advances in the field. The course will encourage hands-on learning on health information systems, EHRs, and analytic tools, simulating real-life healthcare environments. 

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Students will learn how informatics can enhance healthcare delivery. It is a perfect way to apply critical thinking while improving clinical decision-making skills. The review from accreditation evaluation is important for the faculty and students engaged with the nursing education process to achieve greater accountability. By involving shareholders in the assessment procedure, securing provisions for program progress, and proving their promise to constant development (Sapci & Sapci, 2020). The authorization group and sympathetic standards are vital to safeguarding that medical prospectus, like the “Healthcare Informatics” course. It meets the highest standards of quality and relevance. Applying accreditation evaluation results to maximize curriculum development ensures enriched educational outcomes and better preparation of nursing graduates to meet the changing healthcare setting. 

Integrating Faculty Feedback into Course Design Assessment

Implementing feedback from Assessments 1 and 2 into the “Healthcare Informatics” course is vital to align it with the goals of the BSN program at the University of San Francisco. Response from Appraisal 1 highlighted the need for clearer alignment between course objectives and program outcomes. It demonstrates how the revised curriculum supports the educational mission. Faculty highlighted the importance of incorporating interdisciplinary perspectives and encouraging collaboration with technology specialists and healthcare administrators to provide students with practical applications of EHR systems. This curriculum will explicitly connect learning activities to broader program competencies. It helps students see the relevance of informatics in achieving program goals.

Assessment 2 identified resource limitations for teaching healthcare informatics and suggested forming strategic partnerships with local healthcare institutions to embed EHR systems into training modules. Faculty suggested varied approaches like communicating virtual portals and hands-on seminars to provide various teaching methods and improve participation. Additionally, regular formative assessments and peer evaluations will be incorporated to track student progress and promptly identify areas for intervention. The results of these assessments will be used to refine the course content and provide targeted support for students. It guarantees their competency in healthcare informatics and readiness for real-world applications. A robust ongoing evaluation strategy will support these improvements.

It is confirming the course remains relevant to evolving healthcare practices. Regular curriculum reviews will integrate updated faculty feedback, industry trends, and student performance data to refine content and maintain alignment with national standards. These enhancements will address faculty concerns about curriculum rigor and provide students with practical skills and interdisciplinary knowledge essential for success in healthcare informatics. Aligning the course with these improvements ensures measurable program outcomes. It includes enhanced student proficiency in EHR systems and informatics tools, which will prepare students to excel in a dynamic healthcare environment and meet the needs of modern healthcare systems.

Conclusion

Assessing “Healthcare Informatics” within the curriculum for BSN degrees at the University of San Francisco would reveal its importance in preparing nursing students to manage contemporary health-related issues. Faculty input through an assessment process has been fundamental to refining the course about programmatic objectives and accrediting standards. Pilot testing has been another pivotal area, providing insight into what is most effectively taught and how resources must be allocated to ensure a seamless infusion into the overall curriculum. Short-term evaluations would focus on immediate course enhancements and diversified teaching strategies. In contrast, long-term evaluations focus on ongoing refinement through continuous feedback and adaptation to emerging healthcare trends. Accreditation guidelines by recognized bodies ensure the courses offered maintain the highest quality of education and relevance.

References

Bagheri, S., Zarshenas, L., Rakhshan, M., Sharif, F., Sarani, E. M., Shirazi, Z. H., & Sitzman, K. (2023). Impact of Watson’s human caring-based health promotion program on caregivers of individuals with schizophrenia. BMC Health Services Research, 23, 711. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09725-9

Baker, N. N., AbuAlrub, S., Obeidat, R. F., & Assmairan, K. (2021). Evidence-based practice beliefs and implementations: A cross-sectional study among undergraduate nursing students. BMC Nursing, 20, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00522-x

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Booth, R. G., Strudwick, G., McBride, S., O’Connor, S., & López, S. A. L. (2021). How the nursing profession should adapt for a digital future. The British Medical Journal, 373, n1190. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1190

Budin, W. C. (2022). Benefits of accreditation. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 31(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1891/jpe-2021-0031

Cieslowski, B., Haas, T., Oh, K. M., Chang, K., & Oetjen, C. A. (2023). The development and pilot testing of immersive virtual reality simulation training for prelicensure nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 77, 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2023.02.001

Deborah, R., Cowan, L., Barrett, B., Toyinbo, P., Sullivan, S., Powell-Cope, G., Melillo, C., & Chavez, M. (2020). Evaluating an evidence-based practice curriculum for nurses entering clinical practice in the Veterans Health Administration. Journal of Health Science and Education, 4(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.61545/jhse-1-202

Eckhoff, D. O., Sanz, G. F., & Anderson, M. (2022). Telehealth across nursing education: Findings from a national study. Journal of Professional Nursing, 42, 308–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.07.01

Giddens, J., Douglas, J. P., & Conroy, S. (2022). The revised AACN Essentials: Implications for nursing regulation. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 12(4), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2155-8256(22)00009-6

Koukourikos, K., Tsaloglidou, A., Kourkouta, L., Papathanasiou, I., Iliadis, C., Fratzana, A., & Panagiotou, A. (2021). Simulation in clinical nursing education. Acta Informatica Medica, 29(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2021.29.15-20

Manzanares, M. C., Llamazares, M.-C., & González, Á. (2020). Effectiveness of blended learning in nursing education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051589

Nouraey, P., Al-Badi, A., Riasati, M. J., & Maata, R. L. (2020). Educational program and curriculum evaluation models: A mini systematic review of the recent trends. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(9), 4048–4055. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080930

Sapci, A. H., & Sapci, H. A. (2020). Teaching hands-on informatics skills to future health informaticians: A competency framework proposal and analysis of health care informatics curricula. JMIR Medical Informatics, 8(1), e15748. https://doi.org/10.2196/15748

Savic, B. (2020). Teaching EBP in nursing curricula in six European countries—A descriptive study. Nurse Education Today, 94(94), 104561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104561

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Singh, A., & Haynes, M. (2020). The challenges of COVID-19 in nursing education: The time for faculty leadership training is now. Nurse Education in Practice, 47, 102831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102831