NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

Name

Capella university

NHS-FPX 6004 Health Care Law and Policy

Prof. Name

Date

Title Slide: Training Session for Policy Implementation 

Welcome to our training session on implementing the proposed policy and practice guidelines within Mercy Medical Center (MMC). This presentation will equip nurses with essential knowledge and tools to improve diabetic eye care, ensure better patient outcomes, and comply with federal guidelines. Let us move forward to the presentation objectives. 

Slide 1: Training Presentation Objectives 

The objectives for today’s session are:

1. Analyze MMC’s performance compared to established benchmarks and identify areas of underperformance.
2. Outline the new policy and practice guidelines.
3. Explore research-based methods to engage nurses in policy implementation.
4. Discuss how this proposal will impact nurses’ routines and responsibilities.
5. Explain the proposal’s impact on overall quality of care and patient outcomes.
6. Highlight nurses’ role in policy implementation. 
7. Identify necessary resources and materials for effective training.
8. Summarize the key points and conclude the training session.

Slide 2: MMC’s Performance Evaluation

Our evaluation of the MMC performance dashboard against the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) benchmarks revealed significant underperformance in key diabetes care metrics, including eye examination, foot examination, and HgBA1c. For further development, we chose eye examination tests as they showed a significant shortfall from the benchmark (75.2%) (AHRQ, n.d.). In contrast, MMC’s performance was substantially lower: only 35.5% of patients received eye exams in 2019, increasing slightly to 41.2% in 2020. Performing eye examinations in diabetic patients is necessary to prevent the risk of diabetic retinopathy, which, if undetected, can lead to severe vision loss. Thus, we aimed to target this metric to address a critical gap in diabetes care and align MMC’s performance with national standards.

Slide 3: New Policy and Practice Guidelines 

In accordance with the recommendations by the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA), our proposed policy mandates that all patients diagnosed with diabetes receive an annual dilated eye examination, with biennial screenings for those with no signs of retinopathy and well-controlled glycemia (Jotte et al., 2023). Several practice guidelines have been established for the seamless implementation of this policy, which revolves around the roles of healthcare providers, administrators, and patient advocates. Healthcare providers, including nurses and doctors, will identify diabetic patients and ensure they are scheduled for the necessary eye exams.

Nurses, particularly, should educate patients on the importance of these screenings to increase their compliance with screening visits (Moinul et al., 2020). Simultaneously, administrators should ensure that required screening resources are available, conduct follow-up audits, and address implementation barriers. Finally, patient advocates will develop culturally competent educational materials and advocate and establish telehealth services in partnership with community organizations to overcome access barriers (Dhediya et al., 2022). These guidelines aim to enhance patient adherence, improve early detection of diabetic retinopathy, and enhance organizational performance. 

Slide 4: Evidence-based Methods to Work with Role Group

To obtain nurses’ buy-in and prepare them for implementing the new policy, the first evidence-based strategy is to incorporate nurse input and feedback into the policy implementation process. Inayat et al. (2023) suggest that engaging nurses in policymaking empowers them toward practical implementation, enhancing patients’ outcomes and care delivery. This can be done through regular meetings and feedback sessions to allow nurses to voice concerns, suggest improvements, and share experiences, fostering a sense of ownership and collaboration. 

Another effective strategy is recognition and rewards. Research suggests that rewarding healthcare workers for their positive participation and accomplishments results in increasing motivation to enhance care quality further (Gaughan et al., 2020). This strategy can be related to our case by linking adherence to the policy and successful implementation of the practice guidelines with performance reviews to offer nurses clear incentives to comply with and support the new policy. It is an effective strategy because it aligns personal and professional goals with organizational objectives, making the policy a concrete part of nurses’ daily responsibilities. 

Slide 5: Early Indicators of Success 

Early indications of the successful implementation include an increase in the number of diabetic patients scheduled for and receiving annual eye exams. Positive feedback from nurses regarding the policy will also signify success. Additionally, early success can be tracked by monitoring the reduction in missed appointments and improved patient adherence to screening schedules. Regular audits and follow-up surveys can provide data on compliance rates and identify any initial barriers, ensuring continuous improvement in the implementation process.

Slide 6: Implementation and Impact of Proposal

The proposal aims to standardize eye examination throughout the organization to detect diabetic complications, such as retinopathy, early and improve patient outcomes. However, the implementation of the new policy and practice guidelines will significantly impact nurses’ daily work routines and responsibilities. To integrate this policy effectively, nurses will be required to adopt new procedures and workflows. The implementation process will involve several steps to ensure a smooth transition. 

1. Initially, we will conduct comprehensive training sessions to educate nurses about the new policy, its importance, and its practical application.
2. Following training, nurses will be equipped with reminders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system to schedule and track patient eye exams. These reminder systems will improve patients’ compliance with screening visits, ensuring the success of the proposal (Nielsen et al., 2021).
3. Regular follow-up meetings and feedback sessions will be held to address any challenges and make necessary adjustments. 
4. Finally, a mentorship program and peer support groups will be established to provide ongoing support and facilitate knowledge sharing (Nokkala et al., 2021). 

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

The new policy will alter nurses’ daily routines by adding responsibilities related to patient education, scheduling, and follow-up. Nurses will require additional time and resources to integrate patient education sessions, manage reminders for upcoming exams, and ensure compliance with the new guidelines. While the additional responsibilities may initially increase workload, they are designed to improve patient care and align with best practices for diabetes management. The successful implementation of retinal examinations in diabetes patients will enhance their health outcomes, reduce the risk of diabetic retinopathy, and contribute to the overall quality of care (Vujosevic et al., 2020). 

Slide 7: Proposal and Quality of Care and Patient Outcomes 

The new policy and practice guidelines for annual diabetic eye examinations are crucial for enhancing the quality of care and patient outcomes at MMC. For nurses, this policy aligns with best practices and directly influences their pivotal role in diabetes management. By mandating annual eye exams for diabetic patients, the policy addresses a critical aspect of diabetes care: preventing diabetic retinopathy, a primary factor resulting in vision loss within the diabetic population (Kropp et al., 2023). Performing regular screening for high-risk individuals will allow nurses and other healthcare professionals to detect and intervene, significantly improving patient outcomes in a timely manner. 

This policy also provides a structured framework to enhance the quality of patient care. By integrating eye exam reminders into the EHR and emphasizing patient education about the importance of these exams, nurses will be empowered to contribute actively to better diabetes management. The practice guidelines ensure that nurses are equipped with the tools and knowledge needed to support patients comprehensively, reducing variations in care and improving patient outcomes (Cassidy et al., 2021).

Engaging with this policy enhances nurses’ roles in patient education and care coordination. It supports their professional development by integrating evidence-based practices into daily routines, ultimately improving job satisfaction through positive patient outcomes. This policy reinforces the importance of their role. It provides direction to make a significant impact on patient health, ensuring that their efforts lead to meaningful improvements in the quality of care.

Slide 8: Nurses’ Importance in Policy Implementation 

Nurses play a pivotal role in the successful implementation of the proposal. Nurses’ roles extend beyond providing safe care to participating in organizational and systemic changes to improve quality and safety configurations (Oldland et al., 2020). Their involvement is crucial due to their direct and frequent interactions with patients, making them critical drivers in the adoption of diabetes screening policies and implementing practice guidelines, such as performing tests and educating patients. Their role ensures that the policy translates into sustainable improvements in patient outcomes, aligning clinical practice with the latest evidence-based standards.

In the future, it is envisioned that they will be involved early in the policy development process and offered comprehensive training that highlights the value of their contributions. Recognizing and celebrating their successes, such as improved patient adherence rates, will also foster a sense of accomplishment and motivation. Their efforts in adhering to and implementing the new policy will lead to marked improvements in patient health outcomes, reinforcing their essential role in achieving excellence in care (Inayat et al., 2023). This vision not only underscores their contributions but also inspires ongoing dedication and pride in their impactful work.

Slide 9: Resources and Materials for Training Sessions

Instructional Content

The instructional content for the training session will focus on the new policy for diabetic eye examinations, including its rationale, implementation steps, and expected outcomes. This content will cover the importance of annual and biennial eye exams, guidelines for patient scheduling and education, and integration into existing workflows. 

Learning Activities

Interactive learning activities will include role-playing scenarios and interdisciplinary meetings. Role-playing will allow nurses to practice eye examination techniques and patient education conversations. Interdisciplinary meetings will facilitate experience sharing, providing feedback, and addressing challenges in implementing the policy, thus keeping nurses and other stakeholders informed (Leykum et al., 2023).

Materials 

Training materials will include comprehensive handouts summarizing the policy step-by-step implementation guides. Moreover, we will provide nurses with eye screening tools to be distributed among the patient population, which allows patients to perform self-screening and enhances their satisfaction (Elsman et al., 2023). These materials will not only support nurses’ learning but also offer tools that nurses can use during and after the training. Each material will be designed to enhance understanding and facilitate the practical application of the new policy in the nurses’ work settings.

The training session can be effectively completed within the allotted two hours. The session will be structured with a clear agenda, including 30 minutes for instructional content, 30 minutes for interactive learning activities, 20 minutes for Q&A and feedback, and 40 minutes for a review of materials and concluding remarks. 

Slide 10: Conclusion 

In conclusion, today’s session has equipped you with the knowledge and tools necessary to implement the new policy on diabetic eye examinations effectively. By embracing these new practices, you will play a crucial role in improving patient outcomes and ensuring compliance with best practices. Your dedication and proactive approach are vital for the successful integration of these guidelines into daily care routines. As you move forward, remember that your efforts not only support our commitment to high-quality patient care but also contribute to our collective success in achieving outstanding health outcomes. Thank you for your participation and commitment.

References 

AHRQ. (n.d.). National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports (NHQDR). datatools.ahrq.gov. https://datatools.ahrq.gov/nhqdr/?tab=national&dash=282

Cassidy, C. E., Harrison, M. B., Godfrey, C., Nincic, V., Khan, P. A., Oakley, P., Ross-White, A., Grantmyre, H., & Graham, I. D. (2021). Use and effects of implementation strategies for practice guidelines in nursing: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01165-5 

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

Dhediya, R., Chadha, M., Bhattacharya, A. D., Godbole, S., & Godbole, S. (2022). Role of telemedicine in diabetes management. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 17(3), 193229682210811. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968221081133

Elsman, E. B. M., Lee, S. Q., van der Aa, H. P. A., van Nassau, F., Wisse, R. P. L., Maarsingh, O. R., Keunen, J. E. E., van Rens, G. H. M. B., & van Nispen, R. M. A. (2023). The evaluation of an online nurse‐assisted eye‐screening tool in older adults receiving home healthcare. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics/Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 43(4), 725–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13110 

Gaughan, A. A., Walker, D. M., DePuccio, M. J., MacEwan, S. R., & McAlearney, A. S. (2020). Rewarding and recognizing frontline staff for success in infection prevention. American Journal of Infection Control, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.208 

Inayat, S., Younas, A., Andleeb, S., Rasheed, S. P., & Ali, P. (2023). Enhancing nurses’ involvement in policymaking: A qualitative study of nurse leaders. International Nursing Review, 70(3), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12828 

Jotte, A., Vander Kooi, W., & French, D. D. (2023). Factors associated with annual vision screening in diabetic adults: Analysis of the 2019 National Health Interview Survey. Clinical Ophthalmology, 17, 613–621. https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s402082

Kropp, M., Golubnitschaja, O., Mazurakova, A., Koklesova, L., Sargheini, N., Steve, K., de Clerck, E., Polivka, J., Potuznik, P., Polivka, J., Stetkarova, I., Kubatka, P., & Thumann, G. (2023). Diabetic retinopathy as the leading cause of blindness and early predictor of cascading complications—risks and mitigation. EPMA JOURNAL, 14(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-023-00314-8

Leykum, L. K., Noël, P. H., Penney, L. S., Mader, M., Lanham, H. J., Finley, E. P., & Pugh, J. A. (2023). Interdisciplinary team meetings in practice: An observational study of IDTS, sensemaking around care transitions, and readmission rates. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 38(2), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07744-6 

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

Moinul, P., Barbosa, J., Qian, J., Chen, M. L., Mohaghegh, M., Kaur, H., Holmes, J., Radman, H., Robinson, T., & Chaudhary, V. (2020). Does patient education improve compliance to routine diabetic retinopathy screening? Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 26(3), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633×18804749

Nielsen, J. H., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Rotevatn, T. A., Peven, K., Fonager, K., & Overgaard, C. (2021). How do reminder systems in follow-up screening for women with previous gestational diabetes work? – a realist review. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06569-z

Nokkala, T., Aarnikoivu, M., & Kiili, J. (2021). Multidisciplinary peer-mentoring groups supporting knowledge sharing in doctoral education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1939142

Oldland, E., Botti, M., Hutchinson, A. M., & Redley, B. (2020). A framework of nurses’ responsibilities for quality healthcare: Exploration of content validity. Collegian, 27(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2019.07.007 

Vujosevic, S., Aldington, S. J., Silva, P., Hernández, C., Scanlon, P., Peto, T., & Simó, R. (2020). Screening for diabetic retinopathy: New perspectives and challenges. The Lancet. Diabetes & Endocrinology, 8(4), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30411-5 

Slide 2: The training session plays a crucial role by equipping healthcare practitioners with the essential awareness and skills required to implement new policy and practice strategies. This is vital for not only meeting but also surpassing diabetes benchmarks, ultimately raising the standard of care (Cordeiro et al., 2022). This training session is designed to facilitate the seamless implementation of new policy and practice guidelines at Mercy Medical Center (MMC). As MMC embraces an enhanced approach to diabetes management, this session serves as a vital conduit for healthcare practitioners. Focused on addressing specific challenges within MMC, the training prioritizes instructional content, engaging learning activities, and relevant materials to empower practitioners with the knowledge and skills essential for effective policy implementation (Song et al., 2023). By tailoring the training to the unique demands of MMC’s healthcare environment, this session aims to foster a culture of continuous improvement and elevate the standard of care.

Evidence-Based Strategies for Role Group Buy-In and Implementation of New Policy 

Slide 3: A multifaceted approach is essential to secure buy-in from the various stakeholders within MMC. Engaging healthcare practitioners, administrators, community leaders, and patients requires tailored strategies that address their unique perspectives and concerns. Implementing targeted educational programs is crucial to inform healthcare practitioners about the significance of regular HgbA1c testing in diabetes management (Davis et al., 2022). Offering training sessions that highlight the impact of improved testing rates on patient outcomes and the broader community’s health can garner support. These sessions should also cover the latest guidelines and best practices in diabetes management to ensure practitioners are well-equipped for the proposed changes. Additionally, providing opportunities for open dialogue and addressing any concerns can foster a sense of ownership and commitment among healthcare practitioners (Moffatt et al., 2023).

Administrators play a pivotal role in operationalizing and integrating new policies. Presenting the financial and operational benefits of improved HgbA1c testing rates is crucial to gaining their buy-in. Clearly outlining the potential for enhanced reimbursement, improved operational efficiency, and positive impacts on the organization’s reputation can motivate administrators to support the initiative. Additionally, involving administrators in the planning and decision-making process allows them to contribute valuable insights and ensures that the guidelines align with the overall strategic goals of MMC (Sims et al., 2022).

Community leaders possess a deep understanding of the cultural and community-specific aspects of healthcare. Involving them in the policy development process ensures that the guidelines are culturally sensitive and tailored to the diverse backgrounds of MMC’s patient population. Conducting focus group sessions or town hall meetings with community leaders allows for collaborative idea generation and ensures that the proposed changes align with the community’s expectations and values (Gourlay et al., 2023). Engaging patients directly is crucial for the success of the new policy. Launching targeted educational campaigns that emphasize the benefits of regular HgbA1c testing in preventing complications and improving overall health is vital. Providing accessible information through various mediums, including digital platforms and printed materials, ensures broad reach. Additionally, actively seeking patient feedback and addressing their concerns helps build trust and fosters a sense of empowerment among the patient population (Davis et al., 2022).

Effectiveness of Strategies

Slide 4: These approaches are effective because they resolve the definite requirements and disquiets of each stakeholder group, creating a sense of inclusivity and shared responsibility. By providing clear and compelling information about the benefits of improved testing rates, stakeholders are more likely to see the value in the proposed changes. Engaging them in the decision-making process nurtures a feeling of ownership and dedication, ultimately boosting the probability of effectively implementing the proposed changes (Maneze & Molloy, 2024).

Early Indicators of Success

Early indications of success can be measured through several key performance indicators. Monitoring the participation rates in educational programs and training sessions among healthcare practitioners, administrators, community leaders, and patients provides insights into the level of engagement and buy-in (Sims et al., 2022). Additionally, tracking the implementation progress, such as the expansion of testing facilities and integration into routine care, offers tangible evidence of policy execution. Surveys and feedback mechanisms can gauge stakeholders’ satisfaction and identify any challenges or areas for improvement. Moreover, tracking HgbA1c testing rates on a quarterly basis will provide early indications of the initiative’s impact on patient outcomes, enabling timely adjustments to strategies if needed (Song et al., 2023).

Impact of New Policy and Practice Guidelines on Diabetes Management at MMC

Slide 5: The application of the proposed policy and practice plans at MMC is composed to have a transformative impact on various aspects of diabetes care, both at the organizational and individual levels. These changes are designed to address the gap in HgbA1c testing rates and align MMC with national benchmarks, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes (Maneze & Molloy, 2024). The success of the new policy and practice procedures hinges on a carefully orchestrated implementation plan. MMC will initiate targeted educational campaigns to inform healthcare practitioners, administrators, community leaders, and patients about the importance of regular HgbA1c testing in diabetes management.

These campaigns will utilize digital platforms, printed materials, and in-person sessions to ensure comprehensive coverage and engagement (Maneze & Molloy, 2024). Simultaneously, MMC will expand the availability of HgbA1c testing facilities within the hospital and through community-based outreach programs, reducing logistical barriers for patients. Integration into routine care practices will be facilitated through training programs for healthcare providers, ensuring seamless adoption and adherence to the latest guidelines (Moffatt et al., 2023).

Effects on Daily Work Routines and Changes in Responsibilities

Slide 6: The implementation of the new guidelines significantly impacts the daily work of the healthcare practitioners and administrators within the selected role group. Healthcare practitioners now face a shift in their daily routines, requiring adjustments to patient care plans for the integration of regular HgbA1c monitoring. Training programs become essential for these practitioners to acquire the necessary skills for conducting and interpreting HgbA1c tests, reflecting a crucial transformation in their professional responsibilities. Additionally, practitioners must allocate additional time during patient visits to fulfill the educational component of the guidelines, emphasizing the importance of testing and discussing results with individuals (Davis et al., 2022).

On the administrative side, the impact is profound as well. Administrators within the role group play a pivotal role in managing the logistical aspects of the guideline implementation, including resource allocation for advanced testing equipment and patient education materials. The need for potential staff reallocation or hiring to manage the increased testing volume creates an additional layer of responsibility. Financial planning and budget adjustments become imperative for administrators to navigate these changes successfully. Moreover, administrators oversee the integration of testing into routine care processes, ensuring that these modifications do not disrupt the overall operational efficiency of the healthcare facility (Maneze & Molloy, 2024). 

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

Community leaders will be instrumental in ensuring cultural sensitivity and acceptance of the guidelines within MMC’s diverse patient population. They may be involved in disseminating information about the importance of testing within their communities and addressing any cultural concerns or misconceptions. Collaborative efforts with community leaders will help tailor the guidelines to better align with the specific needs and expectations of MMC’s patient demographic (Song et al., 2023). For patients, the impact will be felt through increased awareness and access to HgbA1c testing. Educational campaigns will empower patients to take a vigorous role in dealing with their diabetes, fostering a sense of ownership over their health.

The convenience of expanded testing facilities and integration into routine care will reduce barriers to compliance, making it more likely for patients to adhere to recommended testing schedules (Sims et al., 2022). Incorporating ethical and cultural considerations into the practice guidelines is paramount for ensuring high-quality healthcare delivery. The emphasis on cultural competence and patient-centered care within the guidelines reaffirms MMC’s commitment to respecting diverse patient backgrounds. This approach not only aligns with ethical healthcare practices but also underscores the importance of clear communication and understanding of cultural nuances, fulfilling the criteria of interpreting reflections or practice strategies with respect and precision (Sims et al., 2022). Through this ethical lens, the involvement of community leaders becomes integral in fostering cultural sensitivity, disseminating information, and addressing any concerns within MMC’s diverse patient population.

Justification of the New Policy and Practice Guidelines

Slide 7: The overview of a new policy and practice strategy at MMC holds paramount importance in elevating the care and outcomes associated with diabetes management. The selected role group, comprising healthcare practitioners, administrators, community leaders, and patients, will directly benefit from these initiatives, contributing to a transformative impact on patient health and organizational efficiency (Moffatt et al., 2023). Healthcare practitioners experience a direct shift in their routines, requiring adjustments to patient care plans and additional training for proficiency in HgbA1c testing. Administrators within the role group play a vital role in managing logistical aspects, involving resource allocation and financial planning to integrate the guidelines into routine care processes seamlessly. Collaborating with community leaders is integral for fostering cultural sensitivity, disseminating information, and building trust within MMC’s diverse patient population. Patients, as active participants in their healthcare, benefit from increased awareness and access to testing, empowering them to actively engage in their diabetes management (Snowdon et al., 2022).

The new policy focuses on improving HgbA1c testing rates, a pivotal metric in diabetes management. By adhering to evidence-based strategies, such as targeted patient education, increased accessibility, and routine integration of HgbA1c testing, the proposed guidelines aim to elevate patient outcomes significantly. Regular monitoring through HgbA1c testing allows for timely interventions and adjustments in diabetes management plans, thereby reducing the risk of complications and hospital readmissions. The emphasis on patient teaching permits people to be actively involved in their healthcare journey energetically, adopting a sense of responsibility for their well-being (Snowdon et al., 2022).

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for diabetes management typically include annual diabetes-related exams, including HgbA1c testing, as a crucial component (CDC, 2022). The National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report (NHQDR) sets benchmarks for HgbA1c testing rates, providing a national standard to assess the effectiveness of diabetes care (AHRQ, 2022). These guidelines emphasize the importance of regular monitoring and management to enhance patient outcomes and align with federal healthcare policies. This alignment not only ensures compliance with federal and state healthcare policies but also positions MMC as a healthcare provider committed to achieving and exceeding national standards. The positive correlation between adherence to these benchmarks and improved patient outcomes reinforces the significance of the new policy in elevating the care provided by MMC (AHRQ, 2022; CDC, 2022).

The implementation of guidelines aligns with the role group’s collective effort, as healthcare practitioners witness streamlined processes in patient care, reduced delays, and improved resource allocation. Administrators play a crucial role in managing the financial implications, ensuring initial investments lead to long-term sustainability, improved reimbursement rates, reduced hospital readmissions, and overall fiscal health for MMC (Gourlay et al., 2023).

The new policy is integral in reinforcing MMC’s commitment to equitable and patient-centered care. By actively involving community leaders and tailoring educational campaigns to diverse cultural backgrounds, the guidelines aim to bridge healthcare disparities within the community. Building and maintaining trust among patients, especially those from vulnerable populations, is essential for effective diabetes management (Snowdon et al., 2022). The policy’s focus on inclusivity and cultural sensitivity aligns with ethical healthcare practices, fostering a positive relationship between MMC and its patient community. The selected role group stands to benefit significantly from these initiatives as they collectively contribute to a paradigm shift toward excellence in healthcare delivery at MMC (Agastiya et al., 2022).

Role Group’s Importance in Implementing New Policy and Practice Guidelines 

Slide 8: Healthcare practitioners constitute the backbone of policy implementation at MMC. Their clinical expertise and daily interactions with patients make them key influencers in adopting the new guidelines. By ensuring that practitioners are well-versed in the latest diabetes management practices through training and education, MMC sets the stage for seamless integration of HgbA1c testing into routine care. Empowering practitioners with the knowledge and tools to execute the policy enhances the quality of care provided, directly impacting patient outcomes (Kehlenbrink et al., 2022).

Administrators play a pivotal role in operationalizing the new policy and practice guidelines. Their strategic insights and decision-making abilities contribute to the successful execution of initiatives. Allocating resources, facilitating training programs, and aligning the guidelines with the overall organizational strategy are among their critical responsibilities. The effective collaboration between administrators and healthcare practitioners ensures a cohesive and coordinated effort, fostering an environment where policy implementation becomes an integral part of MMC’s operational framework (Agastiya et al., 2022).

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

Engaging community leaders in the implementation process is instrumental in ensuring cultural sensitivity and inclusivity. Community leaders serve as cultural anchors, providing insights into the diverse backgrounds and expectations of MMC’s patient population. By involving them in decision-making and educational initiatives, MMC taps into their influence to bridge communication gaps and build trust. The positive impact of community leaders extends beyond policy implementation, creating a foundation for sustained community engagement and improved health outcomes (Kehlenbrink et al., 2022).

Patients, as active partners in their healthcare journey, play a crucial role in policy success. The new guidelines emphasize patient education, empowering individuals to understand the importance of regular HgbA1c testing and actively participate in their diabetes management. Through targeted campaigns and accessible information, patients become advocates for their health. By fostering a sense of shared responsibility, MMC envisions patients not only as recipients of care but also as informed decision-makers contributing to positive health outcomes (Rosta et al., 2023).

Empowering the Role Group for a Visionary Future

Slide 9: The selected role group’s empowerment lies in envisioning a future where MMC stands as a beacon of excellence in diabetes management. Healthcare practitioners seamlessly integrate HgbA1c testing into their daily routines, witnessing improved patient outcomes and reduced complications. Administrators navigate operational challenges with efficiency, ensuring that MMC’s fiscal health is sustained and resources are optimally allocated (Rosta et al., 2023). Community leaders, deeply engaged, foster an environment of trust and cultural inclusivity. Patients, armed with knowledge, actively participate in their care, contributing to a community where diabetes is effectively managed and health disparities are progressively minimized. This collective vision propels the role group towards a future where MMC is synonymous with unparalleled healthcare delivery and patient-centric excellence (Klatt, 2024).

Designing Effective Training for the Implementation of New Policy

Slide 10: The initiation of the training session should begin with a thorough introduction to the novel policy and practice guidelines, underscoring the significance of enhancing HgbA1c testing rates for effective diabetes management. This segment will clarify the objectives and expected outcomes, ensuring all participants understand the context and significance of the guidelines. Subsequently, instructional content should delve into the specific strategies outlined in the policy, with a focus on patient education, accessibility enhancements, and routine integration of HgbA1c testing (Snowdon et al., 2022). The content will be enriched with real-life case studies, highlighting successful interventions and showcasing the positive impact of adherence to guidelines on patient outcomes.

Interactive learning activities will be incorporated to reinforce understanding and promote active engagement. Small group discussions will enable healthcare practitioners to share insights and experiences, fostering a collaborative learning environment. Role-playing scenarios related to patient education and communication will allow participants to practice skills essential for effective guideline implementation. Additionally, a Q&A session will provide an opportunity for clarification and address any concerns, ensuring participants feel confident in applying the guidelines to their daily work (Gourlay et al., 2023).

Printed materials and digital resources will serve as essential tools for the training session. Handouts summarizing key points of the policy, best practices, and contact information for additional support will be distributed. A digital presentation featuring visual aids, such as charts and graphs illustrating the potential impact of improved testing rates, will enhance comprehension. Access to an online platform for follow-up resources, including webinars and FAQs, will be provided, ensuring ongoing support and reinforcement of the training content (Agastiya et al., 2022).

Slide 11: Justification for Effectiveness

The selected learning activities and materials align with the unique demands of employing new policy and practice strategies at MMC. Small group discussions facilitate knowledge sharing and provide a platform for participants to learn from each other’s experiences. Role-playing activities simulate real-world scenarios, allowing healthcare practitioners to hone their communication skills, which is crucial for patient education. The Q&A session ensures that any uncertainties are addressed promptly, building confidence among participants. Printed materials and digital resources cater to diverse learning preferences, offering a comprehensive and accessible toolkit for continued reference (Koning et al., 2023).

Completion within Two Hours

While the depth of content is substantial, careful planning and concise presentation will enable the training session to stay within the allotted two hours. The agenda will be structured to prioritize essential topics, focusing on the practical application of the guidelines in participants’ daily work. Interactive activities will be strategically integrated to maintain engagement without compromising the time frame. The efficient use of visual aids and concise, targeted discussions will contribute to the streamlined delivery of the training, ensuring that participants leave with a thorough understanding of the policy and strategies (Koning et al., 2023).

Conclusion

Slide 12: The overview of the new policy and practice plans at MMC signifies a strategic commitment to enhancing diabetes management. By prioritizing healthcare practitioners’ training with tailored content, interactive activities, and pertinent materials, MMC aims to bridge knowledge gaps and foster effective implementation. This comprehensive approach ensures that practitioners are well-equipped to navigate the complexities of the guidelines, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes and reinforcing MMC’s commitment to excellence in healthcare delivery.

References

Agastiya, C., Kurianto, E., Akalili, H., & Wicaksana, A. L. (2022). The impact of telehealth on self-management of patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review on interventional studies. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102485 

AHRQ. (2022). National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports | Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality. Ahrq.gov. https://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/index.html 

CDC. (2022, March 15). How to promote eye health for people with diabetes | Diabetes | CDC. Www.cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/professional-info/health-care-pro/diabetes-eye-health.html 

Cordeiro, L., Gnatta, J. R., Ciofi-Silva, C. L., Price, A., de Oliveira, N. A., Almeida, R. M. A., Mainardi, G. M., Srinivas, S., Chan, W., Levin, A. S. S., & Padoveze, M. C. (2022). Personal protective equipment implementation in healthcare: A scoping review. American Journal of Infection Control, 50(8), 898–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2022.01.013 

Davis, J., Fischl, A. H., Beck, J., Browning, L., Carter, A., Condon, J. E., Dennison, M., Francis, T., Hughes, P. J., Jaime, S., Lau, K. H. K., McArthur, T., McAvoy, K., Magee, M., Newby, O., Ponder, S. W., Quraishi, U., Rawlings, K., Socke, J., & Stancil, M. (2022). 2022 National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care, 48(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106211072203 

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

Gourlay, A. R., Sutherland, C., & Radley, A. (2023). Point-of-care testing of HbA1c levels in community settings for people with established diabetes or people at risk of developing diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Primary Care Diabetes, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2023.10.011 

Kehlenbrink, S., Ansbro, É., Besançon, S., Hassan, S., Roberts, B., & Jobanputra, K. (2022). Strengthening diabetes care in humanitarian crises in low- and middle-income settings. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 107(9). https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgac331 

Klatt, E. C. (2024). Cognitive factors impacting patient understanding of laboratory test information. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100349 

Koning, C., Pelletier, M., & Spooner, J. (2023). The national health service England diabetes prevention program—A narrative review. Journal of Diabetology, 14(4), 198–201. https://doi.org/10.4103/jod.jod_89_23 

Maneze, D., & Molloy, L. (2024). Nurses’ adoption of diabetes clinical practice guidelines in primary care and the impacts on patient outcomes and safety: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104747 

Moffatt, S., Wildman, J., Pollard, T. M., Gibson, K., Wildman, J. M., O’Brien, N., Griffith, B., Morris, S. L., Moloney, E., Jeffries, J., Pearce, M., & Mohammed, W. (2023). Impact of a social prescribing intervention in North East England on adults with type 2 diabetes: The multimethod study. Public Health Research, 11(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3310/aqxc8219

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

 

Rosta, L., Menyhart, A., Mahmeed, W. A., Al-Rasadi, K., Al-Alawi, K., Banach, M., Banerjee, Y., Ceriello, A., Cesur, M., Cosentino, F., Firenze, A., Galia, M., Goh, S.-Y., Janez, A., Kalra, S., Kapoor, N., Lessan, N., Lotufo, P., Papanas, N., & Rizvi, A. A. (2023). Telemedicine for diabetes management during COVID-19: What we have learnt, what and how to implement. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1129793 

Sims, E. K., Besser, R. E. J., Dayan, C., Geno Rasmussen, C., Greenbaum, C., Griffin, K. J., Hagopian, W., Knip, M., Long, A. E., Martin, F., Mathieu, C., Rewers, M., Steck, A. K., Wentworth, J. M., Rich, S. S., Kordonouri, O., Ziegler, A.-G., Herold, K. C., & for the NIDDK Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group. (2022). Screening for type 1 diabetes in the general population: A status report and perspective. Diabetes, 71(4), 610–623. https://doi.org/10.2337/dbi20-0054 

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

Snowdon, J. L., Ballen, S. E., Gruen, D., Gagliardi, T. A., George, J., Park, Y., Sylla, I., Rosario, B., Kim, G., Chen, C.-H., & Ball, M. (2022). Direct primary care: A new model for patient-centered care. Cognitive Informatics in Biomedicine and Healthcare, 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07696-1_2 

Song, Y., Beltran, J., Canelo‐Aybar, C., Valli, C., Ballester, M., Rocha, C., Salas-Gama, K., Santero, M., Niño, E., Spoiala, C., Gurung, P., Cools, I., Bleeker, J., Laure, T., van, Pacheco‐Barrios, K., Mavridis, D., Zevgiti, S., Alonso‐Coello, P., & Groene, O. (2023). Self-management interventions for adults living with type II diabetes to improve patient-important outcomes: An evidence map. Healthcare, 11(24), 3156–3156. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11243156